Just how much of a lying cunt does one have to be to equate Jihad with religious freedom!? Qasim Rashid sinks to the challenge:
What else would you call a Muslim who refuses to defend a Church or Synagogue being attacked by terrorists? Indeed such a Muslim is a hypocrite.— Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@MuslimIQ) November 9, 2017
Jihad = protecting universal religious freedom for *all* people https://t.co/WyBndlyTea
"Universal religious freedom" is an utterly anti-Islamic concept.
What did the infamous, wicked Prophet of Islam say about this matter?
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260:
Narrated Ikrima: Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, 'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' "
Sunnis and Shias, of course, agree with this:
There is also a consensus by all four schools of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence (i.e., Maliki, Hanbali, Hanafi, and Shafii), as well as classical Shiite jurists, that apostates from Islam must be put to death. The process of declaring a person to be an apostate is known as takfir and the disbeliever is called a murtad.
What about the birth place of Islam today? Saudi Arabia bans:
- the building of churches on its territory.
- Jews or anyone with an Israeli passport.
- Ahmadis like Qasim Rashid who peddle fake Islam. (Sweet irony!)
It still astonishes me that someone could be so reliably dishonest and deceitful as Qasim Rashid. The guy is an anti-truth machine.