James Delingpole writes an excellent article on Climategate. It's amazing to read so much concentrated deception from top-level scientists -- considering that their dishonesty would eventually be shown as such since not all scientists are fabricators.
Of course, they figured out a way to get back at honest researchers. Go there to see a sample of:
a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.