Previous month:
May 2007
Next month:
July 2007

Death for Muhammad

Times Online via Michelle Malkin:

Britain's decision to award Salman Rushdie a knighthood set off a storm of protest in the Islamic world today, with a Pakistani government minister giving warning that it could provide justification for suicide bomb attacks.

What he said:

Today, Pakistan's religious affairs minister suggested that the knighthood was so grave an offence that any Muslim anywhere in the world would be justified in taking violent action.

"If somebody has to attack by strapping bombs to his body to protect the honour of the Prophet then it is justified," Mr ul-Haq told the National Assembly.

Mr. ul-haq is continuing the legacy of his father, the military dictator Zia ul-Haq. Zia was responsible for establishing Section 295C in the Pakistani Penal Code--today it mandates death for anyone who, in any way, criticizes Muhammad.

More:

Sher Afgan Khan Niazi, the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs who proposed the resolution, called Rushdie a blasphemer. "Every religion should be respected," he told the National Assembly, "I demand the British government immediately withdraw the title as it is creating religious hatred."

That's rich coming from a country where thousands of madrassas produce mindless, frothing, Jihad bots.


No Joy For Joy

Who is Lina Joy?

Lina Joy is a Malay convert from Islam to Christianity. Born Azlina Jailani in 1964[1] in Malaysia to Muslim parents, she converted at age 26. In 1998, she was baptized, and applied to have her conversion legally recognized by the Malaysian courts. Though her change of name was recognized in 1999 and so noted on her identity card, her change of religion was not (since it is without the Mahkamah Syariah[2] confirmation document); for this reason, she filed suit with the High Court in 1999, bypassing the Syariah Court (Islamic court). She later filed suit with the Federal Court in 2006.[3][4] Joy hopes to live openly as a Christian; she was forced to go into hiding by the publicity surrounding her case.[5]

In a majority verdict delivered on May 30, 2007, the Federal Court rejected her appeal.[6] Her appeal was dismissed 2-1 by Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim and Datuk Alauddin Mohd Sheriff. The ruling stated that "a person who wanted to renounce his/her religion must do so according to existing laws or practices of the particular religion. Only after the person has complied with the requirements and the authorities are satisfied that the person has apostatised, can she embrace Christianity.... In other words, a person cannot, at one's whims and fancies renounce or embrace a religion."[7]

Why would a person go to such lengths to change one word?

Legal recognition would have allowed her to have the change of religion noted on her national identity card; it would also remove the legal barrier to her marrying her Christian fiancé (marriage between Muslims and non-Muslims is forbidden under Malaysian law and the Syariah; the non-Muslim partner is required to convert to Islam under Malaysian law).

A blogger who recently attended an event relating to Lina Joy says:

When I took the mic, I pointed out something which seemed to have escaped their minds: that the Lina Joy issue is a procedural one, it does not have any real relevance to the application of the apostasy laws in Islam.

Uh-hunh.

Of course that does not mean that Lina Joy is exempt from these same laws, but that is a different story.

How compassionate.

Update
Basically what Menj thinks about the Lina Joy affair:

1. It's mostly a bureaucratic matter.
2. Lina Joy, a Christian woman, ought to be murdered since Islamic law supports that position.
3. Why are non-Muslims so rude? They should just SHUT UP and let Muslims deal with "their" issue.


Leaving Islam

Mideast Youth: Interview with an Arab atheist.

Q: Yes the problem with us Muslims is that many of us are very emotionally attached… so weird. I’m over-defensive but not obsessively so. My arguments are also entirely emotional and not factual which is really retarded.

A: As long as you respect different people I have no problem with anything you choose to believe in. This level of respect and tolerance isn’t found with ease in our societies.

Q: A lot of Muslims all over the Muslim world would literally kill anyone who disagrees and then they expect progress. In my opinion this isn’t really Islam. By the way, what do you think about Koranic (real) Islam and political Islam?

A: No offense but the fact that there are so many types of Islam only proves that it’s not a real religion but rather one created simply for the sake of social control.

Oooh, I like this guy.

Link via Dhimmi Watch.


No Honor II

The Telegraph: Revealed: rising toll of deaths before dishonour.

One young woman, too scared to be identified, tells a shocking tale of brutality at the hands of her family. When she refused a forced marriage her three elder brothers lured her to a relative's home and beat her for an hour. "I was bleeding and my nose was broken," she says, "but even so my brother handed me lighter fuel and a box of matches and said, 'You know what you have to do. Do it or we will do it for you'." She was rescued by friends but knows that if her family ever find her she will be killed.


No Honor

View from the Right:

This is one real-life horror story that you can be sure Hollywood will never make into a movie.

An excerpt from the article:

Bekhal, 22, ran away aged 16 rather than agree to an arranged marriage to a cousin in Iraq.

She survived an attempted killing by her brother, but her sister Banaz, 20, paid the ultimate price for leaving her own arranged marriage and then falling in love with an "unsuitable man" of her own choice.

On the orders of her 52-year-old father and uncle, Ari Mahmod, 50, she was strangled with a bootlace by Kurdish assassins, her body stuffed in a suitcase and buried six feet down in the garden of a house belonging to an associate in Birmingham.

Later:

According to Bekhal, integration was the very last thing on her father's mind, although she says he seemed happy to accept Britain's hospitality in the form of a council house and benefits.

Of course.

Another excerpt:

"We used to have to wear a headscarf and trousers to school, which was so hot," Bekhal recalls. "I didn't want to wear mini-skirts or makeup like some of the girls, but I longed to take my headscarf off.

"One day I was walking home through the park and I'd taken my scarf off and my father saw me. He screamed at me: 'Who do you think you are? You are acting like a bitch.'

"He pulled me inside the house, spat in my face and then picked up his slippers to beat me around the head as he shouted: 'Don't you ever disobey me.' In the two years before I ran away, I think he beat me more than 20 times.

This is the mainstream reality of women in the Islamic world. The West can now witness the wretchedness up close.

Read it all.


Ignorant Twirps

The US Congress wants to make "price gouging" illegal. You see, the free market is free as long as it doesn't settle on a price that is "unreasonable" or "unconscionably excessive".

Simple prediction: many gas station owners will close down their places during emergencies. Why should they sell anything at a loss and risk fine / jail for "unreasonable" prices?

These politicians really don't get the basic supply and demand curves if they actually think that legislating in such manner will get them "reasonable" results.


Useful Infidels

Victor Davis Hanson:

In Gaza the fighting between Fatah and Hamas has escalated to the point of all-out civil war, replete with dead women and children, kneecapping, and handcuffed prisoners thrown from roofs. Meanwhile in Lebanon, the Lebanese army continues to shell a Palestinian refugee camp, with who knows how many civilian deaths. Arab is killing Arab, Muslim is killing Muslim, and the world basically is shrugging its shoulders.

How different from the intense media attention and the U.N.’s hysteria over Israel’s attempt to root out terrorists in Lebanon last summer. This obscene double standard that strains out the gnat of Israeli self-defense while swallowing numerous camels of Muslim-on-Muslim violence cries out for explanation.

Read it here.


Global Muslim Outrage in 4, 3, 2....

If only one could figure out a Jewish angle:

Jamal Abu Jadian, a top Fatah commander, fled his home in the northern Gaza Strip Tuesday evening dressed as a woman to avoid dozens of Hamas militiamen who had attacked it. He and several members of his family and bodyguards were lightly wounded.

But when Abu Jadian arrived at a hospital a few hundred meters away from his house, he was discovered by a group of Hamas gunmen, who took turns shooting him in the head with automatic rifles.

"They literally blew his head off with more than 40 bullets," said a doctor at Kamal Udwan Hospital.

Mark Steyn offers his scathing take on the whole matter.


Bending the Mind

A friend sent me the link to this fascinating post at Gene Expression. The too-short article should be read in its entirety. An excerpt:

A few years ago a cousin of mine invited me over to his place and asked me to indulge myself in the pornographic films in his collection of DVDs as I sat under a wall poster of the Kabba on his couch. Later he told me luridly about how he had sex with a woman in his bedroom while our other cousin listened to their grunts. At this point he offered me a beer, and waxed eloquently about how "our women" are not "like that" and are "pure." He has a daughter now (with one of "our women"), and of course he would fly into a rage if anyone treated her as an object purely of sexual gratification at some point in the future. This sort of behavior is not unknown amongst Muslim males, indulgences in the pleasures of the flesh with "kuffar" women is within the bound of acceptability because questions of honor, shame and virtue are irrelevant when it comes to those outside of Islam.

Razib then goes on to describe similar behavior he witnessed among his Christian schoolmates. Though in one major way, the "Islamic conduct" has a very different effect on "their" society: Muslim women are practically caged.

Here in the West it's an ordinary sight to see single women walking about, going shopping, coming back from work, etc. But such is not the case in Muslim-majority nations. In fact, in Saudi Arabia the muttawa (the religious police) will take a young woman to jail for being out alone in public.

This also reminds me of a story from the defunct blog Terrorism Unveiled. Athena, the female blogger, narrated this incident:

Today I was visiting the Center for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan and my roommate, we’ll call her Sally, went with me because she had to meet with the same professor as I.

She started crying in the taxi on the way back home telling me about her experience the other night with her Jordanian boyfriend, we’ll call him Malik.

Sally and Malik haven’t been dating for very long and I won’t go into the details of their relationship, but she really did like this guy, and I liked him as well. He seemed very Western, spoke English well, acted respectably, dressed nice, came from an affluent and well-off family. He even lived in Europe for two years and had relationships with girls there.

They went out to eat last night and she brought up the subject of honor killings. Malik nonchalantly said that he would be willing to kill his sister or support his uncle or dad if they killed her if she had sex.

Sex for Malik is, however, perfectly halaal.


Support Palestinian Rights!

The Jerusalem Post:

Alarmed by the growing number of Palestinians who are emigrating from the Palestinian territories, the Palestinian Authority's mufti has issued a fatwa [religious decree] forbidding Muslims to leave.

Text from the fatwa:

"We hereby declare that emigration from the blessed lands is not permitted according to religious law. The people living in these areas must remain in their homes and must not leave them to conquerors. Those who abide by this ruling will perform an honorable deed and will support the Aksa Mosque."

We've heard countless Muslims whine about the "Right of Return" for decades. Will they now stand up and support the "Right to Leave"?

Or perhaps that boiling passion for the Return is a not-so-subtle way of finishing off the uncouth Jewish state.

Link via Donald Sensing.


The Demented of the World

CNN via IBA:

Iran's parliament on Wednesday voted in favor of a bill that could lead to the death penalty for persons convicted of working in the production of pornographic movies.

Only five Iranian lawmakers voted against this insanity.

With a 148-5 vote in favor and four abstentions, lawmakers present at the Wednesday session of the 290-seat parliament approved that "producers of pornographic works and main elements in their production are considered corrupter of the world and could be sentenced to punishment as corrupter of the world."

The term, "corrupter of the world" is taken from the Quran, the Muslims' holy book, and ranks among the highest on the scale of an individual's criminal offenses. Under Iran's Islamic Penal Code, it carries a death penalty.

It simply isn't enough for these totalitarian immoralists to stay away from x-rated material; they have to go out and murder anyone who dares to make a living out of the activity. And do note they are interpreting and applying Islamic law.

Let's see how many enraged Muslims come forward and march against this perversion of the peaceful and harmonious nature of Islam...


The Victim Mentality, Again.

An unhinged post at Muslim Matters:

Washington Times is intensifying its witch-hunt of CAIR. In a front-page (at least on the online edition) article written by Audrey Hudson, she grossly misleads the readers with the headline 'CAIR membership falls 90% since 9/11‘.

What's misleading about it?

IF CAIR was faltering so much, WHY would Washington Times even bother to pay so much attention to it?

That is the question. Why does the MSM give so much attention to an organization which is getting less and less support from its own community?

Washington Times deliberately misconstrues some data for two purposes: mislead Muslims into deserting CAIR and mislead the rest of Americans in considering CAIR as an unimportant organization that does not deserve attention. And who replaces CAIR for attention? Really no one… a few liberal, sell-outs like Zuhdi Jasser and Kamal Nawash will get more coverage so that they can pretend to be speaking for Muslims, while completely selling out on everything that Muslims stand for. In other words, Muslims will have no REAL civil-rights voice. On another point, it is OUR collective job to expose people like Zuhdi, Kamal, and the ilk for the charlattan, and fraud they are.

I've seen only this video of Zuhdi Jasser. He seems like a sensible fellow. How fitting that he's loathed by such a CAIR-supporting imbecile.


The Small Bigots

Kashmiri Nomad:

It should come as no surprise to even the most comatose of observers that there are people in this world who do not like Muslims or Islam. From even a cursory examination of the blogosphere using Technorati and Google Blog Search a plethora of weblogs can be found when one searches using terms like Islam or Muslims. The general thrust of these weblogs is to expose the "violent, terrorist, expansionist and imperial" nature of Islam and by extension Muslims.

Quite right.

One of the primary foundations upon which anti-Islam bigots build their hatred of Muslims is that the fact that Muslims are engaged in struggle to destroy western civilisation. This civilisational conflict is being played out on two fronts. The first front is composed of Muslims trying to attack the west from outside. The second front is composed of Muslims resident in the west trying to destroy it from the inside. Is this representation true of all Muslims? For the anti-Islam bigot it most certainly is an absolute truth.

[Emphasis mine.]

The Nomad is very adept at (a) building the most succulent strawmen one can find and (b) abusing the language till the meaning of words is inverted.

I am not aware of a single weblog that claims that all Muslims support the violent nature of Islam. It's The Nomad who conjured that up. This kind of strawman has been used before.

It is true, though, that many sites have sprung up over the past few years that detail the odious nature of Islam and the support of a majority of Muslims for said nature. (You're reading one such site.) This isn't merely an opinion: majorities of Muslims do think that sharia should be enforced in every Islamic society in the world. The Taliban era is actually a role model for them!

That is why increasing numbers of Westerners are opposing gender apartheid, restriction of free speech, religious discrimination and the killing of homosexuals -- all the things that are the essence of sharia.

For this, they are called "bigots".


Osama's Fan

The Australian "cat meat" Mufti has been replaced by this pig:

In his first day in the job, the cleric Sheik Fehmi Naji el-Imam stuck by his long-standing view questioning whether bin Laden was behind the 2001 attacks.

I'm shocked!

Despite his remarks regarding the September 11 attacks, Sheik Fehmi is widely respected as a moderate Islamic leader who has often spoken out against terrorism.

He doesn't even accept the premise of the present war but, somehow, he is still moderate and against terrorism.

I wonder what the extremists are like.

Update
Austrolabe comments on the news:

Every word that Sheikh Fehmi has ever uttered on the public record, every letter of support he has written to the Immigration Review Tribunal, every lecture ever held at the sheikh’s mosque, and every other detail of the sheikh’s life is going to be scrutinised by those with an interest in selling papers or selling a particular agenda.

How about the agenda of dealing with a sane Mufti? (Or is that an oxymoron?)

Sheikh Fehmi is a decent man who has, over many decades, served Islam and the Muslims of this country. He deserves better than this.

I can't top that.


Scaring Away The Goose

The Independent:

For a nation that invented the term "guest worker" for its immigrant labourers, Germany is facing the sobering fact that record numbers of its own often highly-qualified citizens are fleeing the country to work abroad in the biggest mass exodus for 60 years.

This statistic is incredible:

OECD figures show that Germany is near the top of a league of industrial nations experiencing a brain drain which for the first time since the 1950s now exceeds the number of immigrants.

That's what happens with consistent soak-the-rich policies--the rich get fed up, pack up and leave.


Confusion About Suzi

The Daily Times via Metroblogging Lahore.

The Lahore Zoo is likely to celebrate the silver jubilee of the only elephant, Suzi, on the zoo premises on Saturday [past].

I've been to the Lahore zoo -- it's the largest in Pakistan. I think the last time I was there was in 1994. I still remember walking around and hearing the lion's terrifying roar from quite a distance away. Also, they have an area filled with different snakes. That was very creepy.

Anyway, this part about Suzi is a bit puzzling:

The participants will be shown a documentary in which detailed information about Suzi will be given. Suzi’s journey of life starts from the forests of Africa. How he was brought into Pakistan and what benefits and grievances he had to face during his stay here. Her lonely life, no life partner and kids around have made Suzi hysteric.

So, which is it?


Little Love For What Matters

"Top Five Reasons For Loving Pakistan".

1. Civilization.

This is a peculiar choice. I once talked to a Bangladeshi who disparaged the brief history of North America on the same grounds.

I asked him, "Why are you in Canada?"

"Um, because of the education and jobs."

That 5000+ years of civilization is cute but it says very little of life in present-day Pakistan. (Also, considering the fact that for most of that time, the people of the past were--how shall I put this?--INFIDELS! makes this claim even more amusing. Most Pakistanis would be quite surprised by this solidarity with those dead jahils.)

2. The People.

I'm sorry but I can't go with this one either. Understand: I don't have a problem with individual Pakistanis but taken collectively they are a convoluted and crazy bunch. Let me detail a few troublesome aspects:

  • They haven't been able to have a functioning democratic nation in 60 years: coups, assassinations and government revolutions are the norm.
  • The public doesn't control the military--it's the other way around.
  • Propaganda and glorification of jihad in Kashmir in newspapers, magazines and children's stories. I know; I've read them.
  • Corruption in practically every sector of society. Fake products galore; water put in milk; minced beef mixed with other meats (your guess is as good as mine (I'd say dog meat)); no public outcry for explicit, open and vicious abuse of children and women.
  • An unabashed sense of euphoria upon hearing about 9/11.

Also coming from an Ahmadi family I don't have any illusions about Pakistani good will or hospitality.

3. Spirituality.

Sure, keep this one.

4. Natural Beauty.

No argument.

5. The Cuisine.

Okay, that's impressive as well.

The desserts are out of this world in Lahore. My mouth waters when I think of the Lahori kulfi and falooda that I had there ten years ago.

It's twelve now. Still, I ain't going back.


The Poor Muslims

Eva writes about her personal experience on important days in American history. Her life on 9/11:

I had just dropped off the last child at school and turned on the radio in the car. I heard a plane had hit the WTC. A sinking feeling came over me. Remembering the attack in 1993, I wanted to believe--as the announcers did--that it was a fluke--an accident. Yet something inside told me to prepare for the worst. Sure enough another plane hit and I knew. This was not an accident. I kept praying silently that this did not involve Muslims. I was in hijab and prayed silently to make it home before Muslims got blamed for it.

Interesting choice of words there.


Leaving Allah

Salahudin starts to write about his apostasy.

You have no idea how much I chastised myself at even thinking the Quran could be imperfect, even if I found it incredible to believe that the Quran was perfect. After all, perfection is something that could not be improved any further and I had the feeling that that was a rather high standard to achieve! But I ignored that and purposely pushed such “satanic” thoughts out of my mind.

The Devil can be so logical at times.

Click here for the second part.

Topics like “why will good non-Muslim people be sent to hell?”, “how can I believe in jinns (spirits)!? I’ve never seen one and I highly doubt any sane non-delusional person has either…”, “how can you say man was made from clay and yet insist Islam is in perfect harmony with science?” and “why should only a male lead prayers? why should women pray behind men? why can men marry 4 women and not vice versa” and many others were never satisfactorily answered.

Hey, I asked questions as well!

Also read the third part.

Touring my cousin’s college campus one day, I came across an MSA (Muslim Student Association) stall.

Oooh, fun fun!


India Feels the "Peace"

Rediff via Jihad Watch:

A written statement and video compact disc that was delivered to a local news agency on Friday afternoon by 'Al-Qaeda India' has announced waging of a 'Jihad' (Holy war) against India.

Home Ministry sources in Delhi said it was highly unlikely that Al Qaeda could have engaged in the circulation of the CD and it was possible that Lashker-e-Tayiba could be behind it to "boost the morale of its demoralised cadres".

Ah, so a local Jihadi group is trying to puff itself up by using another recognized brand. Still, the consequences of Jihad are the same regardless of whether the Muslims call themselves Al Qaeda or not. Plus, it is fitting that the largest democracy in the world would attract such monsters.


High Definition Video on the PC

Tom's Hardware Guide:

We'll concentrate on high-definition video formats like HD DVD and Blu-ray, and dig into what it takes to get them to work on the PC and investigate how the user experience is impacted by the new HD digital rights management components.

With this eye to the future, we'll use the newest video card architectures available, as well. We'll see what Nvidia's newest DirectX 10 cards, the Geforce 8800, 8600, and 8500 can do for HD video. We'll also see what ATI's newest flagship card brings to the table, the HD 2900 XT.

It's a very thorough and informative piece.


Veiling Evil

Read this ugly post about Saudi Arabia. The direct link:

“The clothing doesn’t speak to who they are,” Hinrichs said. “It’s an interesting part of who they are, but it’s not all of it.”

Hinrichs emphasized that there is no law designed to make women wear the garments, but that many do wear the clothes out of tradition.

[Emphasis mine.]

That is a lie. From March 2002:

Saudi Arabia's religious police stopped schoolgirls from leaving a blazing building because they were not wearing correct Islamic dress, according to Saudi newspapers.

In a rare criticism of the kingdom's powerful "mutaween" police, the Saudi media has accused them of hindering attempts to save 15 girls who died in the fire on Monday.

"No law designed to make women wear the garments"! The Saudis would rather murder women than have them go out in public without their heinous black covering.


A Regime That Fears Freedom

The Guardian via Pejman:

Want to start a blog in Iran? Then you'll have to register it with the government - which has recently begun to require that all bloggers register at samandehi.ir, a site established by the ministry of culture of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government.

All you need do is give your personal information, including your blog's username and password - otherwise it will be filtered and blocked so that nobody in Iran, and perhaps outside too, will be able to access it.

Blog filtering is only the latest method of control.

But censorship isn't just for blogs. Most of Iran's reformist newspapers have been shut down, rooftop satellite dishes are banned, books are censored and relationships between boys and girls are limited.


The Kingdom of Hell

From inside one of the most vile societies in the world.

One afternoon, a candidate invited me to meet his daughter. She spoke fluent English and was not much younger than me. I cannot remember whether she was wearing hijab, the Islamic head scarf, inside her home, but I have a memory of pink. I asked her about the elections.

"Very good," she said.

So you really think so, I said gently, even though you can't vote?

"Of course," she said. "Why do I need to vote?"

It speaks volumes of (a) her internalization of her "lesser" value in society that she thinks it's perfectly alright for her to not vote and (b) her little understanding of liberty; she'll happily deny the right of any other woman to vote:

"Maybe you don't want to vote," I said. "But wouldn't you like to make that choice yourself?"

"I don't need to," she said calmly, blinking slowly and deliberately. "If I have a father or a husband, why do I need to vote? Why should I need to work? They will take care of everything."

Isn't it glorious to be a perpetual slave child?

Saudi women who've experienced freedom know what they're missing:

Over coffee one afternoon, an economist told me wistfully of the days when he and his wife had studied overseas, how she'd hopped behind the wheel and did her own thing. She's an independent, outspoken woman, he said. Coming back home to Riyadh had depressed both of them.

"Here, I got another dependent: my wife," he said. He found himself driving her around, chaperoning her as if she were a child. "When they see a woman walking alone here, it's like a wolf watching a sheep. 'Let me take what's unattended.' " He told me that both he and his wife hoped, desperately, that social and political reform would finally dawn in the kingdom. He thought foreign academics were too easy on Saudi Arabia, that they urged only minor changes instead of all-out democracy because they secretly regarded Saudis as "savages" incapable of handling too much freedom.

I think there's more to it than that. Academia tears down the West at every opportunity but when it comes to Islamic barbarity all across the world today, very few dare to speak up.

Another reason for their silence is that these enlightened souls don't want to help the neo-con camp. Speaking candidly about Islamic practices in Iran or Saudi Arabia will give ammunition to the "warmongering" Westerners. And we can't have that. For these academics petty politics trumps the human dignity of millions.

More posts about Saudi Arabia:
Airport Idiocy.
The Muslim Lifestyle in Mordor.
The Holy Land of Racism.
What Muslims Learn.
Arranged Marriage and Arabian Society.
The Land of Mordor.
Nourished on Poison.


Iran Wants Chaos

The Blotter via Instapundit:

NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.

They were for the humanitarian wing of the Taliban!

The logic is quite simple:

"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."

All alliances are halaal when one is fighting The Great Satan.