End Muslim Immigration Because...
Feb 20, 2007
Muslim migration to the west must stop immediately.
The logic behind this stance is amusing:
My reason for wanting to stop Muslim migration to the west is not because of any of the reasons mentioned above. I believe that Muslim migration must be stopped because the majority of population of the western world do not want Muslims in their countries. This has been true in the 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, 1980's, 1990's and also in more recent times.
For the sake of argument, let's say what this fellow states is true. Then, why haven't the majority of Westerners simply clamored for ending Muslim immigration? For example, the West could seize taking in Muslim immigrants and increase the numbers of bright non-Muslim Indians and Chinese. That's a pool of 2.5 billion people; so the whole process should be fairly easy.
What has stopped the West from doing exactly that for many decades?
Another thing: the political process in the West tells us what Westerners want (at a specific time). The author basically says that the majority don't want Muslims and the politicians, for decades, haven't listened to them. How exactly does he know that the majority don't want Muslim immigration? How did he gauge their opinion on this matter?
Comments