Andrew Neil is an utterly clueless moron:
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?— Andrew Neil (@afneil) 7 April 2017
Never in Mid-East war
Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
Massive foreign aid
More retarded questions:
- What did the Americans do to deserve 9/11?
- What did the Russian children do to deserve the Beslan Massacre?
- What did the British do to deserve the London bombings on 7/7/2005?
- What did the French do to deserve the truck attack in Nice last year?
A few asinine questions for WWII:
- What did the British do to deserve the Blitz?
- What did the Jews do to deserve the Holocaust?
- What did the Chinese do to deserve the Nanking Massacre?
- What did the Poles do to deserve being crushed by Germans and Russians?
Persons of Interest, a media organization dedicated to conversations about social justice, published a powerful video featuring a diverse group of Australian Muslim women sending a clear and potent message to Ayaan Hirsi Ali: You do not speak for us.
The 2-minute video rejects Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s blatant Islamophobia and vehemently claims that she does not represent Muslim women. The video describes her hateful rhetoric as “language used to justify wars, invasion and genocide” and “encourages fear, persecution and violence.”
Do they provide even a single example of such language which encourages "violence". Nope. But we can be sure that they are telling the truth because they're Muslims.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an ex-Muslim and notorious Islamophobe, who has repeatedly profited from bashing and attacking Islam.
Oddly enough, those mythical profits are never communicated. Islam -- the Cult of Death -- calls for her to be murdered. Is that part of her "profit"? Theo Van Gogh, her friend, was attacked and killed in broad daylight in Denmark in 2004. Perhaps, that's also a portion of her "profit"? Ayaan eventually left Denmark in 2007 because the government refused to provide her security which had cost them millions of dollars. "Profit"?
Ignore the Islamic hatred towards a slave who got away. Deny the truth. Just remember: The no-good, very bad, super evil, the Notorious Ayaan Hirsi Ali!
Pakistan was meant to be a model, an example for other nations to emulate. It was founded after World War II, as the sun was setting on the British Empire and India was preparing for independence. India’s Muslims, though glad to see the end of the Raj, were apprehensive about becoming a minority in a Hindu-majority land.
They envisioned instead what might be called a “two-state solution”: the establishment of a homeland for the subcontinent’s Muslims in areas where Muslims were in the majority. Their new nation was to be free, pluralist and tolerant. “We are starting with this fundamental principle,” Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader) declared in 1947, “that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State.”
Jinnah died one year later.
The very creation of Pakistan was a mistake for two big reasons.
1. Pakistan is the original Islamic State. This leaves no room for infidels. 23% of the population of Pakistan was non-Muslim in 1947. Today, it's 3%. The country is a case study in how a society tortures and mutilates itself when it enforces sharia with more vigour with each passing year. We see more honor killings, acid attacks, wretched blasphemy laws, explicit legal discrimination against a minority, etc.
2. Pakistan is not a nation-state. There are four provinces in the country. Each of them has an officially unique provincial language, slightly different food, a dissimilar culture and diverse clothing styles. The relatively cosmopolitan, Urdu-speaking, Bollywood-obsessed, bhangra-crazy peoples of Punjab have barely anything in common with the Pashto-speaking, AK-47-wielding, week-smoking, bacha-baazi-enthusiasts of the North West Frontier Province.
Because of this corrosive reality, Pakistan has already cracked once in 1971 -- East Pakistan became Bangladesh.
The only thing that can be used to barely hold it together is the strict, ruthless enforcement of an old evil: Islam.
There have been many such cases in the U.S., the UK, and Canada of Muslims refusing to pick up fares with seeing-eye dogs. Many of the Somali taxi drivers who made up three-quarters of the 900 taxi drivers at the Minneapolis airport refused to pick up blind passengers because of their dogs. When forced to do so, some of them simply quit.
Muslims hate dogs because of their evil, demented "prophet":
Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. His teachings may have come from cultural bias, Pagan concepts, or his own imagination, but wherever they came from they led to the cruel treatment of dogs.
None of the statements regarding dogs are found in the Quran but they abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology and are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as "impure" and worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed and all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.
Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of God and as such his word was to be obeyed. With the teeth of Islam biting worldwide it is vital that Muhammad’s teachings be scrutinized to determine if he were a nut or a prophet.
Pinnacles of Human Achievement Update: 1969 Moon Landings vs. 2017 Sports Hijab Edition. pic.twitter.com/k5b1hr8Dcu— Satiria (@SatiriaNews) 9 March 2017
It doesn't matter whether you are a libertarian, a conservative, a liberal, a progressive, or a constitutionalist. Your ideology is outdated and irrelevant. It's all identity politics now, and politics is a subset of war. If the matter cannot be resolved politically - and the fact that this is the largest invasion in human history strongly suggests it cannot be - it will be resolved with violence.
The USA will be physically divided. At this point, the only serious questions are a) where the lines will be drawn, b) the level of violence involved, and c) precisely whom is going to be permitted to remain where.
Latinos are ruthless when it comes to their view and treatment of Blacks. I'm curious to see a) when the colored (anti-white) coalition will fracture and b) how the media narrative will unfold when Blacks are efficiently cleansed from Latino areas.
Brown’s recent lecture offering sly justifications for Islamic slavery and the rape of captured Infidel women has gotten a lot of attention; here is a good summary piece about the controversy from the Daily Caller. Under fire, Brown has backtracked completely.
The Internet never forgets:
That’s great, except it not only contradicts what he said in his speech last Tuesday; it also contradicts what Brown himself said in 2015 in Facebook discussions, in which he avowed that Islam approved of both slavery and rape.
A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.
I'm sure this makes a difference for a slave:
The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States.
Of course, Muslims are also very nice to their slaves:
Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.
The triggering continues:
A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy.
Via Bare Naked Islam:
Imagine if this were 1930, and the Southern Poverty Law Center existed, and it issued a lavishly illustrated, apparently meticulously documented report on critics of the Nazis, dubbing them “anti-German hate group leaders.” There were profiles of Winston Churchill, Edgar Mowrer, and other early critics of Hitler, noting when they had made false claims about Hitler (false, that is, according to the Nazis) and charging them with “hate” and “anti-German bias.”
Imagine then that the mainstream media, whenever it quoted Churchill, Mowrer, or the others, described them as “anti-German,” and noted that the Southern Poverty Law Center said that they were hate group leaders. It would call them “rabble rousers” and “wide boys” and “demogogues.” Quotes from Goebbels and Göring would also invariably be included, calmly explaining the truth of the matters at hand and patiently answering questions about what a shame it was that they had to deal with the likes of Churchill.
The sad thing is that this isn't far from the truth.
A letter from Osama bin Laden detailing when jihadists should be allowed to masturbate has been revealed. The Al-Qaeda leader had such a pull on his followers that he was able to dictate when they pleasured themselves.
Osama also liked to choke the chicken.
In 2015, US officials refused to release details on the 'extensive' porn collection found in Osama bin Laden's Pakistani bolt-hole, because of the 'nature' of the smut.
Man, I feel sorry for all those animals.
Asian Dave: "If you look throughout all of history, the people who have been responsible for the most heinous shit throughout all of history has been the white devil."
Off the top of my head:
- Turkey murders over a million Armenians in the mid to late 1910s.
- Japanese annihilate millions of Chinese in the 1930s.
- Chinese die by the tens of millions thanks to Mao Zedong.
- Cambodian slaughter in the mid to late 1970s.
- Rwanda: nearly a million killed in 1994.
That's just the last hundred years. No race has a monopoly on evil.
Thrashing white people is a very odd way of glorifying non-white peoples. It's always puzzling to me when non-whites living in a largely white, Western nation use their freedoms to ... trash whites. If you truly think that whites are the devils, then why do you live among them? Wouldn't it be moral to live among the, er, angelic, tolerant, pacifist non-whites?
Today’s jihad attack at the Louvre — to which the mujahid is said to have carried a backpack containing paint bombs — suggests that the attacker intended to damage or destroy some of the priceless works of art that are exhibited in the most renowned art museum in the world.
For those who study the Islamic theology and law, the attempt is no surprise. Islam mandates the destruction of art and other artifacts created by infidels, because they represent the jahiliyyah, the “time of ignorance” before Mohammed brought the word of Allah to his disciples.
Bill Warner gives us a brief history lesson:
The people in the video are saying that it's okay to punch "Nazis" because Nazis are intolerant and violent. The followers of Muhammad have murdered far more innocents than the followers of Hitler. Hence, their own logic would work really well if one were to replace the word Nazis with Muslims.
This is why the average American voter despises the media: Trump handed nuclear codes to missiles which could end humanity.
The most powerful armoury in history contains enough nuclear firepower to flatten buildings in an area with a circumference of 48,269 km — an greater than the circumference of the planet.
A city like London would be completely destroyed by a single megaton bomb, meaning the US' 1,027 megatons would eliminate around 1,027 cities the size of central London, or would instantly kill 647 million people, if set off in urban areas.
Oddly enough, such doomsday reporting was utterly absent eight years ago when a conceited, mediocre, buffoon was sworn in.
Today, the man who ruined three political families -- the Bushes, the Clintons and the Obamas -- will become the most powerful man on Earth for eight years. He is the new Reagan. We will see lower taxes, a beautiful wall, the annihilation of ISIS and the fake tears of Muslims.
Proof that God exists!
Today, the first Kenyan, Muslim, affirmative action president of the United States will be put in the dustbin of history.
As Larry Wilmore wouldn't say, "Good riddance, nigga!"
The man tells it like it is:
Four white people kidnapped a black guy and tortured him while calling him a retarded nigger. If that did happen, then the story would have been used as incontrovertible evidence of racist, white supremacist, NAZI Trump's America. Instead it was four blacks who assaulted a white guy.
THEY TOLD ME IF WE ELECTED TRUMP, RACIAL HATE CRIMES WOULD ABOUND. AND THEY WERE RIGHT! Chicago Police: 4 in custody after man tied up, tortured on Facebook Live.
The greatest evils very often take place in response to much lesser ones. If 250 years does not suffice to make a single nation out of two very different peoples, then it should be manifestly apparent that no amount of time is ever going to be enough. The fact that so many people have so much trouble simply admitting the obvious and undeniable is not a testimony to the rational ability of Man, no matter what his race, creed, or color.
As Big Gay Steve has observed, the amount of money that has been spent unsuccessfully trying to turn a mostly unwilling nation of Black Americans into ersatz White Americans would have permitted humanity to have established colonies on Mars. Forget all the victims of all the crimes over the years, and ignore bloodshed of the inevitable wars in the years to come, perhaps the greatest sin of the Civil Rights debacle of the last 50 years is the opportunity cost.
On top of this two centuries of chaos, the left has added Hispanics who, of course, are famous for their brotherly love for blacks. And more recently, the left is trying to bring in more and more Muslims -- who think that blacks are filthy, subhuman barbarians fit to be slaves. You see, the left wants to make an anti-white, voting coalition comprising of Hispanics, Blacks and Muslims!
Yeah, this is going to end well.
One of the many ludicrous demands made by Arabs is the 'Right of Return'. All those muzzies (and their future kids!) who left Israel in 1948 should be allowed to return to Israel. What about all those Jews who were kicked out of Arab countries? Do they get a similar "right"?
The simple, brutal reality is that the Arabs are not interested in peace. They loath Jews because that's built into the DNA of their death cult called Islam. They want the destruction of Israel. It was a mistake to give back the Sinai, the Golan Heights and the Gaza Strip. All it did was bring the enemy closer to the core of Israel.
Muslims are doing their best to make every major nation an enemy. CAIR already loathes the US and her constitution and now these dim clowns are cheering over a Russian plane crash.
Can you imagine a World War III in which the muzzies face off against the Grand Infidel Alliance of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, France, Italy, Russia and China? It almost makes one feel sorry for the wicked fools.
If Muslims actually read history, then they would never mess with Europe. Watching the following video, one word came to my mind: Carthage.
When last year German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to almost one million refugees and asylum seekers, she invited the Trojan horse of Islam into her country. Among the so-called refugees were many young men of Islamic background, filled with hatred for the West and its civilization. One of them was Anis A.
A statistic that keeps popping up is that 99% of Muslims are peaceful. If this is correct, then out of the two million migrants in Germany only 20,000 are maniacal, violent murderers.
This year, 1,500 police officers will be patrolling the streets in Cologne on New Year's eve. Ten times more than last year. But how many police officers will be needed next year? And the year after that? And what will happen when they are outnumbered? What is needed are not just more police officers; what is needed is a democratic political revolution.
Let no-one tell you that only the perpetrators of these crimes are to blame. The politicians, who welcomed Islam into their country, are guilty as well. And it is not just Frau Merkel in Germany, it is the entire political elite in Western Europe.
Out of political-correctness, they have deliberately turned a blind eye to Islam. They have refused to inform themselves about its true nature. They refuse to acknowledge that is all in the Koran: the permission to kill Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one's true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).
The Koran has nothing to do with Islam!
Police investigating tweets blaming Merkel for terror killing.
Breitbart London reported yesterday on the remarks of senior Alternative for Germany (AfD) member Marcus Pretzell, who Tweeted: “When will the German state of law strike back? When will this cursed hypocrisy finally stop? These are Merkel’s dead!”. Mr. Pretzel’s AfD is Germany’s most vocal anti-mass migration party, and has previously warned opening the nation’s borders would make it vulnerable to terror attack.
Now Welt reports Munich police are investigating the tweet for potentially criminal comments.
Love the irony alarm at 6:34.
Only one in 25 British Muslims believe Al Qaeda was responsible for the September 11 attacks on the US, a poll has found.
The research said it was ‘deeply troubling’ that so many were willing to ‘entertain wild and outlandish conspiracy theories’.
Muslims believe that their prophet is the gold standard of morality -- the same man who stole, waged war, raped a nine-year-old girl, kept sex-slaves, slaughtered hundreds of innocent Jews and so on.
When that monster is your role model, it's easy to believe in any bullshit.
Almost half would not report it to the police if someone they knew was involved with supporters of terrorism in Syria.
What's surprising about this is that so many Muslims in the UK admitted the truth: their allegiance lies with their violent muzzie brothers and sisters. These Muslims are the moral, and often financial, support structure for their Jihadi cousins.
The vast majority of Muslims are not violent mass-murdering Jihadis but the ugly truth is that the global majority of Muslims support the Jihadis. To these Muslims, Osama bin Laden was an angel and members of al Qaeda are victims of senseless American aggression. The West has to wake up to this terrible reality.
Mitchell describes the day he was questioning Khalid Sheik Mohammed, when the 9/11 mastermind announced he had something important to say. “KSM then launched into a gory and detailed description of how he beheaded Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl,” Mitchell writes. Up to that moment, the CIA did not know KSM had personally carried out the murder. When asked whether it was “hard to do” (meaning emotionally difficult), KSM misunderstood the question. “Oh, no, no problem,” KSM said, “I had very sharp knives. Just like slaughtering sheep.”
That shows us that at the fundamental level, a lot of infidels simply do not understand the evil essence of Islam.
Oh, he wan't lying about the gruesome murder.
To confirm his story, the CIA had KSM reenact the beheading so that it could compare the features of his hands and forearms to those in the video of Pearl’s murder. “Throughout the reenactment, KSM smiled and mugged for the cameras. Sometimes he preened,” Mitchell writes. When informed that the CIA had confirmed that he was telling the truth, KSM smiled.
“See, I told you,” KSM said. “I cut Daniel’s throat with these blessed hands.”
The next part show us that at a fundamental level, these muzzies don't understand America.
Today, some on both the left and the right argue that al-Qaeda wanted to draw us into a quagmire in Afghanistan — and now the Islamic State wants to do the same in Iraq and Syria. KSM said this is dead wrong. Far from trying to draw us in, KSM said that al-Qaeda expected the United States to respond to 9/11 as we had the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut — when, KSM told Mitchell, the United States “turned tail and ran.” He also said he thought we would treat 9/11 as a law enforcement matter, just as we had the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the USS Cole in Yemen — arresting some operatives and firing a few missiles into empty tents, but otherwise leaving him free to plan the next attack.
Al Qaeda stupidly believed that after the most lethal terrorist attack on record, America would use more police!? Also, see Dec. 7, 1941.
“Then he looked at me and said, ‘How was I supposed to know that cowboy George Bush would announce he wanted us ‘dead or alive’ and then invade Afghanistan to hunt us down?’” Mitchell writes. “KSM explained that if the United States had treated 9/11 like a law enforcement matter, he would have had time to launch a second wave of attacks.” He was not able to do so because al-Qaeda was stunned “by the ferocity and swiftness of George W. Bush’s response.”
The future will be far worse for you and your ilk.
KSM “said jihadi-minded brothers would immigrate into the United States” and “wrap themselves in America’s rights and laws” until they were strong enough to rise up and attack us. “He said the brothers would relentlessly continue their attacks and the American people would eventually become so tired, so frightened, and so weary of war that they would just want it to end.”
“Eventually,” KSM said, “America will expose her neck for us to slaughter.”
Americans also wanted the war to end in the summer of 1945. They didn't surrender. They nuked the enemy. Twice.
So white officer Alan Horujko who shot and killed the Black Somali stabbing suspect in Ohio is being paraded as a hero. Thats interesting— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 28 November 2016
The minute leaders like Castro & others start talking about EQUAL RIGHTS for Blacks and whites, they suddenly become "dictators" & "tyrants"— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 26 November 2016
Castro wanted ALL Cubans-white and Black- to have the same rights. Notice all the Cubans celebrating his death in Miami are WHITE Cubans?— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 26 November 2016
Tariq Nasheed showed up on Tucker Carlson's show. Nasheed's performance should earn him the Smug Shithead of the Year award.
Ever since his election as Canada’s prime minister last October, Justin Trudeau has revelled in global tributes, raves and swoons. He’s the Disney prince with the trippy dance moves, the groovy Haida tattoo and the gender-balanced cabinet. He’s the last best hope for globalization, the star attraction at the Pride Parades, the hero of the Paris Climate Summit, the guy everyone wants a selfie with.
Trudeau made himself synonymous with Canada. He made Canada cool again. It was fun while it lasted.
By the early hours of Saturday morning, Havana time, Trudeau was an international laughing stock.
Just wait till one of the Syrian refugees detonates. No one will laugh at him then.
For all the parochial Canadian susceptibility to the propaganda myth that pits a shabby-bearded rebel in olive fatigues against the imperialist American hegemon, by the time he died on Friday night Castro was one of the richest men in Latin America. Ten years ago, when he was handing the presidency to Raúl, Forbes magazine calculated that Fidel’s personal wealth was already nearly a billion dollars.
The reality of socialism.
One learns so much from Muslims. For instance, I didn't know that Hitler had about 5,000 Jews killed. That's it. Later the nasty Jews inflated that number to over 5 million!
Thanks to Heartiste for this GIF:
Liberal Newsweek recalled 125,000 collector’s edition copy of their “Madam President” Hillary cover. The Trump Newsweek edition is not available until next week. They didn’t think Trump would win. They trusted the liberal polls.
In Mortal Kombat voice: Humiliation!
Note that this is from June of 2015!
According to former Jimmy Carter pollster Pat Caddell, Hillary Clinton is hemorrhaging support as a result of the FBI announcement and we could see a repeat of the 1980 election when anti-establishment candidate Ronald Reagan won in a landslide.
The Trumpslide cometh.
Caddell explained that the polling between Reagan and Carter was close up until the final weekend when “the dam broke” and Reagan shot ahead by ten points.
We had Brexit in June 2016. It would be gloriously brilliant if their Americans cousins also rejected globalism within just six months.
And the award for The Most Surreal Statement of 2016 goes to:
Ayatolla Mahadavi Kani says in a video circulating in social networks that the Jewish scientist found proof to his Theory of Relativity in the ascension of the Prophet Mohammed.
On October 8th, 2016, Dr. Zeeshan ul-hassan Usmani published a photo on Facebook of his son who is a first grader with the following caption:
“Welcome to the United States of America of Donald Trump. Meet my son Abdul Aziz. He is in grade 1, bullied and beaten by his own classmates in school bus for being a Muslim :/”
The rhetoric that Donald Trump is known for has created an anti-Muslim environment that clearly not even children are free from.
This is a perfect conversation to discuss how no one is born to be racist or discriminatory; racism and discrimination are taught.
So, allegedly a few children bullied and beat up one Muslim kid. Donald Trump gets the blame for creating this environment. However, when Muslims join terrorist organizations and target and murder millions of innocents, the cause is mysterious?
The rhetoric that Procunt Muhammad is known for has created an anti-infidel environment that clearly not even children are free from.
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."
Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."
Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."
Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."
I think this is a perfect conversation to discuss how no Muslim is born to be intolerant or a terrorist; intolerance and terrorism are taught.
In A.D. 301, the famous Edict of Diocletian was passed. The Emperor fixed the prices of grain, beef, eggs, clothing, and other articles sold on the market. He also fixed the wages of those employed in the production of these goods. The penalty imposed for violation of these price and wage controls, that is, for any one caught selling any of these goods at higher than prescribed prices and wages, was death.
We've found solid evidence:
In the Greek parts of the Roman Empire, archeologists have found the price tables listing the government-mandated prices. They list over 1,000 individual prices and wages set by the law and what the permitted price and wage was to be for each of the commodities, goods, and labor services.
Most don't learn from history. Most don't even bother reading it!
A Roman of this period named Lactanius wrote during this time that Diocletian “ . . . then set himself to regulate the prices of all vendible things. There was much blood shed upon very slight and trifling accounts; and the people brought no more provisions to market, since they could not get a reasonable price for them and this increased the dearth [the scarcity] so much, that at last after many had died by it, the law was set aside.”
The theory was perfect. It was the men who were flawed. Hence, they were murdered.
Islam’s holy book, the Quran, and its Prophet Muhammad, granted women rights and regarded women as equals to males, through socially, economically, and spiritually statuses. Given that no nation, culture or religion granted such right to women at that time — or for centuries after that — these teachings were a transformative aspect for all societies.
The BS goes much deeper.
Recently, Muslims in America launched the True Islam and the Extremists campaign which highlights 11 points that are often distorted regarding Islam’s true teachings.
One of the campaign’s points states that true Islam believes in empowerment, education, and equality for women. Many examples during Prophet Muhammad’s time illustrate his keen interest in liberating women from slavery. His work for women’s rights is held dear by many Muslims and non-Muslim women alike, and sets an exemplary standard for us today.
Three simple facts:
- Procunt Muhammad married 12 females during his life. One of them was 6-years-old.
- After waging war against his infidel enemies, he captured many women and distributed them among his soldiers as sex slaves. Muhammad himself kept a few sex slaves. That's right, the evil man who used and kept traumatised women as slaves is lauded by Muslims for "liberating women from slavery".
- Islam explicitly states that husbands can beat their wives. Therefore, this is not a crime in Islamic nations.
I don't know about you but that just screams "empowerment" to me.
A layered 15 years marked by a roller coaster that speeds from attack, public outrage, media sensitization, hijabi hate-crime incident, opportunistic politicians coming out of the woodwork, more hate crimes — followed by a little calm and a glimpse of hope.
But then before you know it, it happens all over again. And every time a tragedy hits labeled “terrorism,” you find yourself transported once again into the 15-year-old you sitting in English class watching the Twin Towers fall, selfishly thinking, “please don’t be Muslims.”
As Muslims that are and/or have become part of the Western landscape, whether by ancestry, choice, circumstance or force, we have come to be intimately familiar with carrying the weight of more than a billion people on our shoulders.
In those 15 years, we've had the annihilation of 3,000 lives in NYC, the bombings in London, the murders of children in Beslan, the multiple assaults in France which resulted in hundreds of deaths and so many more to list. But all that death and carnage pales in comparison to the amputated feelings of Muslims in the West.
The manner in which the popular narrative of “Muslim” is constructed and juxtaposed to “terrorism” is such that it pushes us into spaces where we are made to immediately and intensely feel our Muslim-ness as the ultimate “incomprehensible Other.”
That should be the "reprehensible Other".
Living in a narrowly constructed caricature of the “scary unintelligible subject” is not simply an issue of living in constant conversation with an ill-informed stereotype. That, of course, is a major issue — but what’s more fundamentally at issue is our ability to simply feel, to simply be.
We need to prioritize our communities; prioritize our young people; prioritize our visible Muslimah out there facing a vicious brand of gendered Islamophobia; prioritize our over-securitized brothers who are going to need to stay resilient and collected in the regular routine of ‘random’ security checks that have become their life; prioritize our community workers and activists who put themselves out there fighting the good fight everyday; prioritize our little ones that are going to hear remarks made in school about their identity and history that they are not going to know what to do with; prioritize our poor and highly racialized parts of our community that do not have the luxury of taking the day off, or resources to deal with the layered battles of classism, racism and Islamophobia.
So brave. 15 years of increasing Islamic assaults on the West and not one word against the evil core of his religion. Not one word against his demented coreligionists who keep slaughtering innocents every damn day. It's all about BadFeelz and the super bad, classist, racist, Islamophobic West. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a pukka moderate Muslim.
On February 27, 2016, Dr. Entesar Al-Banna, a columnist for the Bahraini daily Al-Watan, wrote that she had discovered, much to her surprise, that many young Arabs idolize Adolf Hitler, mainly for his strength and steadfastness in fighting the entire world. She assessed that this phenomenon stems from the wave of violence afflicting the region and the sense of helplessness that it causes, as a result of which people look to someone who challenged the rest of the globe. According to her, this worship of strength reflects the instability and the crisis of the Arab world, a crisis which is manifested in many ways, ranging from suppression of free expression to the use of extreme violence on all levels.
Yeah, let's just ignore the part about the slaughter of six million Jews.
"I interrupted one of the girls who said that Hitler was her favorite figure, asking her: 'Are you serious or joking?' She looked at me, amazed, and replied: 'Yes, I am serious.' This led another girl to add: 'I too love Hitler's personality.' I asked the first girl: 'What do you like about Hitler's personality?' She responded, very confidently: 'His strength, and his ability to unite his country's military and leadership and to stand fast in war.' I asked her: 'Do you realize that his strength caused an entire world war, and the destruction of Germany and France?' She responded: 'Yes. I read his book Mein Kampf and was impressed by his strength, his faith, and his perseverance.'
Hitler! Making Jew-hating pussies wet since 1930. The muzzie guys want to be him and the hijabis want him inside.
When Hitler advertised for a secretary, he got thousands of applications. When he visited towns on political rallies, the girls would be out in droves. You could tell by their faces that he could have had them all in his harem if he wanted. The monster had Britain on its knees, North Africa under his heel and almost all of Europe in his grasp at the end of 1941.
And he was exterminating those nasty, filthy Jews. Of course, the Muslim girls would love the uber bad boy.
August 1990: Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Inadvertently, some of his forces easily took over some territory of Saudi Arabia. Some thought that Hussein would eventually gobble up Arabia as well. The US formed the largest coalition since World War II to repel Hussein.
January 1991: Hussein's Iraq was firing Scud missiles into Saudi Arabia. Many missed their military targets and demolished civilian infrastructure instead. Many in Arabia feared that chemical weapons would be used against them by the madman in Baghdad. Civilians were provided with gas masks.
February 1991: The US air force and later the hundreds of thousands of ground troops liberated Kuwait and saved the Middle East -- especially the Arabs living in the land of Saud.
Late 1990s: Many shops in Saudi Arabia had small plastic donation boxes. I asked my dad about their purpose. He told me that the money went to the mujaheddin in Afghanistan. Arabs were freely supporting al-Qaeda.
September 2001: 19 Muslims inflict one of the deadliest assaults on American soil. Almost 3,000 are killed. Ordinary Muslims celebrate.
December 2001: My father worked in Saudi Aramco. I talked to him about the mood at his office right after 9/11. He told me that the Arabs were celebrating like they had won the Football World Cup. Every one was jubilant with one exception. There was one Arab who was not satisfied. My dad went up to him and inquired about his grief. He was looking at the photos and the videos of the collapsing Twin Towers. He said that the towers fell straight down. He was despondent because he hoped that they had fallen on their side. He wished that there had been more death and carnage.
Just a decade after the United States had saved these very people and their families from possible death, slavery and mutilation, they were cheering at, what at the time was thought, the annihilation of 10,000 innocent American civilians.
3. Eternal Enemy
There were reports of certain people celebrating around the US right after 9/11. I met these sorts of people at my university in Canada. I have had conversations with people who openly and proudly supported the Taliban. Wicked glee would be an appropriate term for their reaction to the slaughter of almost 3,000 Americans. What do all of them have in common? Islam.
Muslims are nourished on poison. They are told to hate the unbeliever, the infidel, the kafir. Such has been the case since the evil Muhammad inflicted his cult on the world. That Jew-murdering, slave-owning, paedophile is the role model for over a fifth of humanity. It would be a very confusing world if the Muslims weren't at war with us.
Islam is utterly incompatible with Western Civilization. One simply has to look at the rules and laws of Sunni Arabia and Shia Iran and compare them to the legal books of any Western country. The best thing we can do is to put as much distance as we can between us and them.
Ban Muslim immigration. Burn ISIS. Make it clear to any Islamic organization that even mildly instigates against us: you will be crushed.
4. The Enablers
Why is it that we haven't taken such simple steps to protect ourselves? Islam is the main enemy. But before we get to dealing with it, we have to face the internal foes. The main enablers: the universities, the mainstream media and the leftist politicians.
All of them have a favorite saying about Islam:
Obama thinks that we can absorb another terrorist attack. Obama handed the Islamic terrorist regime of Iran hundreds of millions of dollars. Infidels around the world will pay for that later. He glosses over the slaughter of Christians and imports hundreds of thousands of Muslims into America.
Hillary lets Americans die in Libya. She accepts millions of dollars from the Saudis. The hypocrisy can make one faint.
The very people who're supposed to defend the United States, defend its eternal enemy. They refuse to mention ISIS. They make it deeply unfashionable to call out the evil of Islam. Truth is hate speech.
The moral depravity is not limited to them. Dumb Jews want to be friends with Muslims. Homosexuals march in support of Islam. Feminists are totally cool with the garbage bag burqa.
It was not always so. We had leadership.
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy [...] The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
All is not lost.
After the Brussels attack, the head of Poland's largest party announced that "after recent events connected with acts of terror, [Poland] will not accept refugees, because there is no mechanism that would ensure security."
Victor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary, declared that "we do not like the consequences of having a large number of Muslim communities that we see in other countries, and I do not see any reason for anyone else to force us to create ways of living together in Hungary that we do not want to see...."
Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Slovakia, announced that "Islam has no place in Slovakia."
The Czech Republic, which had in the past taken in a few thousand Muslim migrants, regrets even that, to judge by the remark of its President, Milos Zeman, this January, that "it is practically impossible to integrate Islam into Europe," and made clear that the Czechs will not be taking any more.
We are in another battle in the Longest War. As long as we tell the truth about Islam, unmask the enablers and support those who fight -- Trump, the Alt Right and the Nationalists -- we shall win.
Frank Baylis, the representative of the Pierrefonds-Dollard riding in Quebec, recently sponsored a petition condemning Islamophobia and blanket generalizations of Muslims as violent extremists.
The petition was initiated by Samer Majzoub.
Let's take a look. The first point:
Islam is a religion of over 1.5 billion people worldwide. Since its founding more than 1400 years ago, Muslims have contributed, and continue to contribute, to the positive development of human civilization. This encompasses all areas of human endeavors including the arts, culture, science, medicine, literature, and much more.
Oil was discovered in Arabia almost 80 years ago. Aramco -- the national oil company of Saudi Arabia -- still imports and hires tens of thousands of foreign non-Muslim engineers and technicians to keep its oil flowing smoothly. Why is it that the heart of Islam can't find a measly hundred thousand educated Muslims from the 1.5 billion cousin-humping clowns?
How can Muslims contribute to the West when they can't even dig, refine, transport, and sell their own oil?
Go ahead, name one product that you use which was designed or manufactured in an Islamic nation.
Muslims don't contribute to civilization; they destroy it. Muslims don't design airplanes or tall building; they plow airplanes into tall buildings.
The second point:
Recently an infinitesimally small number of extremist individuals have conducted terrorist activities while claiming to speak for the religion of Islam. Their actions have been used as a pretext for a notable rise of anti-Muslim sentiments in Canada.
It's not a pretext. It's a reasonable reaction. Canadians can see the savagery of Islam in Europe. They can see how some Muslims in Canada migrated to the Middle East to fight for ISIS. They can see how a convert to Islam almost slaughtered dozens of innocents in the largest province of their country. Canadians have a right to keep their country free of Islam, sharia and Muslims.
The third point:
These violent individuals do not reflect in any way the values or the teachings of the religion of Islam. In fact, they misrepresent the religion. We categorically reject all their activities. They in no way represent the religion, the beliefs and the desire of Muslims to co-exist in peace with all peoples of the world.
The Procunt Muhammad, the Satanic starter of Islam, engaged in multiple acts of Jihad in his final years of life. In one of those cases, the Procunt Muhammad went up against a Jewish tribe named Banu Quraiza. That tribe lost the battle. They utterly surrendered. In a mysterious display of co-existence, the Procunt Muhammad beheaded all their adult males and took and distributed their women and children as sex slaves. That is Islam.
Subjugation, humiliation, annihilation, and deception is the creed of Islam. It's there in the demonic Quran. It's there in the evil life of Muhammad.
Your halaal lies are exposed Samer Majzoub. And Frank Baylis? Fuck you too.
Were The Satanic Verses published today, we wouldn’t be surprised at the outrage it would generate. Not in the slightest. Rather, we’d be astonished that anyone would dare write it at all, or that any publisher would release it. In our post-Charlie Hebdo times, every publishing house and editorial office is haunted by the spectre of aggrieved fanatics bursting through the doors with machine guns.
Murder, carnage and terror have had an impact:
‘Today, they would accuse me of Islamophobia and racism’, he said. ‘They would charge me with crimes against a cultural minority.’ There is so much dishonesty today in discussions over Islamism, Rushdie continues, not least our propensity to place murderous perpetrators under the safer category ‘mentally unbalanced’.
Of course, they must steer clear of The Religion That Must Not Be Named.
Today The Satanic Verses would be denounced today as ‘unhelpful’, ‘regrettable’ and ‘inflammatory’.
If only Rushdie was 'mentally unbalanced', then he would be accorded some respect.
The track is a bit wonky at places: the audio and video get out of sync. Anyway, still an informative interview.
Prof. Saad interviews the magnificent Bill Warner on Islam.