Thousands of sexist Islamophobes march against the feminist liberation of Hijab, Iran 1979. pic.twitter.com/ykX5so85Bp— Satiria (@SatiriaNews) 22 July 2017
Europe opened its gates and invited in millions of Muslims over the past few years. For that act of (asinine and suicidal) generosity, this is the thanks infidels get:
A leader of a hardline Islamist group has compared the treatment of Muslims to the massacre of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust.
Are there any examples provided to justify such a ridiculous comparison?
'Muslims are told that in order to be accepted they must conform to a certain set of values different to their own.'
That's it. That's all it takes. If you want immigrants to assimilate, then you're a Nazi. This definition makes diabolical sense given the following:
Mr Qureshi's comments come after fellow Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar was captured on camera saying Muslims who leave the religion should be put to death.
Just to be clear:
- When Muslims are sugarcoating their religion and trying to convert infidels, that's called religious freedom.
- When a dim infidel embraces the wickedness of Islam, then that person deserves congratulations.
- When an infidel wants Muslims to embrace their values, that's practically the Holocaust.
- When a Muslim leaves Islam, then death is the penalty.
It's impossible to resolve these differences peacefully.
War is coming.
You mean that German dictator with whom the Muslims had such warm ties? They did share a mutual love for murdering the Jews, the Yahood, the Zionists.
Also, Muslim girls can't help but get wet for that "certain German dictator":
"I interrupted one of the girls who said that Hitler was her favorite figure, asking her: 'Are you serious or joking?' She looked at me, amazed, and replied: 'Yes, I am serious.' This led another girl to add: 'I too love Hitler's personality.' I asked the first girl: 'What do you like about Hitler's personality?' She responded, very confidently: 'His strength, and his ability to unite his country's military and leadership and to stand fast in war.' I asked her: 'Do you realize that his strength caused an entire world war, and the destruction of Germany and France?' She responded: 'Yes. I read his book Mein Kampf and was impressed by his strength, his faith, and his perseverance.'
So, logically, the Muslimas are fantasizing about being Donald Trump Junior's fuck toy strength, faith and perseverance.
It used to be that high-profile Hollywood World War II movies got called out for taking liberties with the facts. These days, they’re getting in trouble for being too historically accurate.
This is about Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk. So, what's the problem?
Plenty of people have taken to social media to express why they won’t be seeing it, and it’s all to do with the movie being “too white.” (Not sure if they’re aware, but the vast majority of British and Allied forces were white.)
Damn right! Personally, I won't rest till the role of Hitler is played by Morgan Freeman.
Seriously, can you imagine, some ignorant, dumbass going on social media and writing that he won't be watching Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon because it's "too yellow"?
Just sixty years ago, Egyptian politicians were laughing at a "hijab law". The cultural attitude was similar in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The entire Islamic arena seems to have regressed since then. Places that were relatively liberal and free (prime example: Lebanon) have been shattered and reformed into violent, Jihadist entities.
Worse, this chaos is now spilling into the Western world.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today called on Florida-based SCCY Firearms to explain a promotional button issued by that company claiming its handguns are “Real Muslim Stoppers.”
Right now, it's just guns and bullets. The way things are going, we'll be using fat men as Muslim Stoppers.
Operation Overlord was the code name for the Battle of Normandy, the Allied operation that launched the successful invasion of German-occupied western Europe during World War II. The operation commenced on 6 June 1944 with the Normandy landings (Operation Neptune, commonly known as D-Day). A 1,200-plane airborne assault preceded an amphibious assault involving more than 5,000 vessels. Nearly 160,000 troops crossed the English Channel on 6 June, and more than three million Allied troops were in France by the end of August.
What a cataclysm. Millions and millions of young men from the Western world got annihilated to prove a banality: Germany couldn't fight against the combined might of the US, UK and Russia.
During the midst of Saturday’s latest Islamic terrorist attack in London, the city’s Metropolitan police department tweeted an infographic giving the public a three-step plan to respond to the attack. “Run. Hide. Tell,” read the three points on the infographic.
How times have changed:
1940s England: "We shall never surrender!"— Razor (@hale_razor) 4 June 2017
2017 England: "Run and hide." pic.twitter.com/n28O2HacJ0
Western Leftist Hand-wringers form orderly queue to justify murdering children & call for appeasing radical Islam. pic.twitter.com/Eh6cVZcIeR— Satiria (@SatiriaNews) 23 May 2017
This is a fatal ignorance of history. Peoples of the West stubbornly desire peace and abhor violence. So much so that they'll make terrible decisions to avoid conflict today to only guarantee a more lethal war in the future. British appeasement of the Nazis throughout the 1930s is a sad example.
The West hasn't even started to engage in war against Muslims. Worse, the West hasn't even identified the proper enemy. The accelerating rate of atrocities from the Religion of Peace will result in:
- The rise of nationalist political parties.
- The Expulsion of Muslims from the West.
- A total Muslim immigration ban in the West.
If after that Muslims still manage to assault the West, then the war will begin. Eventually, many Muslim countries will be remembered like Carthage.
Race hustler Linda Sarsour really scrapes the bottom of the gutter when she claims that paedophillic warlord Mohammed was actually a human rights activist, the first victim of Islamophobia, and a feminist. Words fail me.
According to Linda Sarsour, Muhammad was also a racial justice activist, an environmentalist, an animal rights activist etc. The video is unintentionally hilarious:
In addition, the so-called prophet Muhammad was:
- a huge fan of Harambe.
- a Climate Change believer.
- in favor of a $25 minimum wage.
- a supporter of free health care including birth control.
- pleasantly surprised with New Coke. Death to Classic Coke!
TRIGGER WARNING: “This show is meant for both Black and White audiences and every other color imaginable” as Variety magazine critiques. If discussing race makes you uncomfortable and you want to just comment below without reading this or watching the show, don’t waste your time. You have been warned.
The title “Dear White People” is controversial to some, but that doesn’t mean that this show is attacking White people. For anyone who thinks White people can be victims of racism, let Samantha White (Tessa Thompson circa 2014) remind you this:
Imagine if a white person said that "Black people are incapable of X". People would call for his head. Now, the fun part:
Black people have never held a system of power and used it against white people. Name one point in history when white people have been marginalized and antagonized because of their race when mostly people of color were in power.
Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe has called on the country's remaining white farmers to cede land to black people. "We say no to whites owning our land and they should go," Mr Mugabe told his supporters at a rally.
Yup, blacks are, like, totally incapable of being racist because they've, like, never ever ever held a system of power and used it against white people. Blacks are, like, so angelic and innocent and pure. That's why they commit so few crimes in the US.
Burning Question: Do Muslims ever get tired of lying?
It's an engrossing and comprehensive speech. It was stunning to learn about the contrast between the public schools and the universities in California. The decline about the quality of students and the quantity of his assigned readings was also depressing.
Canadian Jewish organizations are outraged after a London, Ont. magazine published an anti-Semitic editorial that tries to justify the Holocaust.
Al Saraha, a monthly magazine printed in Arabic and widely distributed around the city, recently printed an article with the headline "The Question Which Everyone Ignores: Why Did Hitler Kill the Jews?"
The article claims the number of people killed in the holocaust is grossly overestimated and it outlines the author's theories about why the atrocities were justified.
Sounds legit. As we know Arabs are famous for their honesty and scholarly output.
As women, especially White women who agitate most loudly for the feminist dystopia, have abandoned their prime directive — birthing the next generation — they have continued to receive largesse from the State. This is unsustainable on both genetic and economic levels. If women turn away from their natural function but continue to receive the State privileges that come attached to an assumption of fertility and child-raising, what we’ll have is an institutionalized system that privatizes profits (female coddling) and socializes costs (mass immigration to provide an ever-exapanding base of consumers for the technoborg).
Yup. What's truly profound is that immigration only kicks the can down the road. You see, most immigrants soon align their birth rates with the host population. Solution? More immigration!
That's what Canada has been doing for over thirty years. After all that, the overall Canadian birth rate is still woefully below replacement level. Today, how can a sane, average Canadian couple afford to start a family when the average house goes for over half a million dollars!?
The Ponzi-scheme-style system will have to be radically changed or eventually it will collapse.
Three additional reasons:
1. Because, somehow, the Nationalist Socialists are considered part of the Right!
2. The Commies were on the winning side in WWII. They defeated the evil Nazis! Ergo, they must be good.
3. Communist regimes still exist today. Obviously, they won't tarnish their ideological ancestors. Worse, the "free world" accommodates them. Just look at how Hollywood bows down to Chinese demands by censoring movies to not offend the regime.
The only solution is Islam reforming itself? Good luck with that. It's kind of difficult to reform Islam into a peaceful religion when its messenger was an intolerant, Jew-murdering, pillaging, paedophile, warlord. Worse, to say that Muhammad was, in any way, immoral is to court death.
Islam, by design, is the last and most perfect religion. It is not malleable. For a Muslim to even suggest that it be changed is to declare oneself a heretic. How do you bring about a moderate Islam when the act of reforming it is a capital punishment? This largely explains why Islam hasn't firmly softened in almost 1400 years. If anything it has gotten more close to its loathsome roots in the recent past. This evidence is most stark in Egypt, Lebanon, Iran and Afghanistan.
The least violent solution for the West is to simply keep Muslims out and to speak the harsh and ugly truth about the evil cult of death.
At the very heart of Islam:
Saudi Arabia has sentenced an atheist to death for uploading a video in which he renounced Islam and the Prophet Mohammed. The man has been identified locally as Ahmad Al Shamri who is in his 20s and from the town of Hafar al-Batin.
Saudi authorities first picked him up in 2014 after he uploaded the video showing men and women dancing which led to him being charged with atheism and blasphemy.
And in a shockingly shocking development:
Shockingly, fellow countrymen appeared to support the punishment handed down by the country's officials when reacting to the sanction online. According to The Independent, one said: 'If you're a lowkey atheist that's fine. 'But once you talk in public and criticize God or religion, then you shall be punished.'
Another poster said: 'I wish there could be live streaming when you cut his head off.'
Can you feel the peace?
More controversy for Yassmin Abdel-Magied, as she tweets then deletes support 4 ppl murdered by intolerant Muslims. pic.twitter.com/7biP5NWzh1— Satiria (@SatiriaNews) 26 April 2017
Of course, her tweet was of a very different nature.
Andrew Neil is an utterly clueless moron:
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?— Andrew Neil (@afneil) 7 April 2017
Never in Mid-East war
Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
Massive foreign aid
More retarded questions:
- What did the Americans do to deserve 9/11?
- What did the Russian children do to deserve the Beslan Massacre?
- What did the British do to deserve the London bombings on 7/7/2005?
- What did the French do to deserve the truck attack in Nice last year?
A few asinine questions for WWII:
- What did the British do to deserve the Blitz?
- What did the Jews do to deserve the Holocaust?
- What did the Chinese do to deserve the Nanking Massacre?
- What did the Poles do to deserve being crushed by Germans and Russians?
Persons of Interest, a media organization dedicated to conversations about social justice, published a powerful video featuring a diverse group of Australian Muslim women sending a clear and potent message to Ayaan Hirsi Ali: You do not speak for us.
The 2-minute video rejects Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s blatant Islamophobia and vehemently claims that she does not represent Muslim women. The video describes her hateful rhetoric as “language used to justify wars, invasion and genocide” and “encourages fear, persecution and violence.”
Do they provide even a single example of such language which encourages "violence". Nope. But we can be sure that they are telling the truth because they're Muslims.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an ex-Muslim and notorious Islamophobe, who has repeatedly profited from bashing and attacking Islam.
Oddly enough, those mythical profits are never communicated. Islam -- the Cult of Death -- calls for her to be murdered. Is that part of her "profit"? Theo Van Gogh, her friend, was attacked and killed in broad daylight in Denmark in 2004. Perhaps, that's also a portion of her "profit"? Ayaan eventually left Denmark in 2007 because the government refused to provide her security which had cost them millions of dollars. "Profit"?
Ignore the Islamic hatred towards a slave who got away. Deny the truth. Just remember: The no-good, very bad, super evil, the Notorious Ayaan Hirsi Ali!
Pakistan was meant to be a model, an example for other nations to emulate. It was founded after World War II, as the sun was setting on the British Empire and India was preparing for independence. India’s Muslims, though glad to see the end of the Raj, were apprehensive about becoming a minority in a Hindu-majority land.
They envisioned instead what might be called a “two-state solution”: the establishment of a homeland for the subcontinent’s Muslims in areas where Muslims were in the majority. Their new nation was to be free, pluralist and tolerant. “We are starting with this fundamental principle,” Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader) declared in 1947, “that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State.”
Jinnah died one year later.
The very creation of Pakistan was a mistake for two big reasons.
1. Pakistan is the original Islamic State. This leaves no room for infidels. 23% of the population of Pakistan was non-Muslim in 1947. Today, it's 3%. The country is a case study in how a society tortures and mutilates itself when it enforces sharia with more vigour with each passing year. We see more honor killings, acid attacks, wretched blasphemy laws, explicit legal discrimination against a minority, etc.
2. Pakistan is not a nation-state. There are four provinces in the country. Each of them has an officially unique provincial language, slightly different food, a dissimilar culture and diverse clothing styles. The relatively cosmopolitan, Urdu-speaking, Bollywood-obsessed, bhangra-crazy peoples of Punjab have barely anything in common with the Pashto-speaking, AK-47-wielding, week-smoking, bacha-baazi-enthusiasts of the North West Frontier Province.
Because of this corrosive reality, Pakistan has already cracked once in 1971 -- East Pakistan became Bangladesh.
The only thing that can be used to barely hold it together is the strict, ruthless enforcement of an old evil: Islam.
There have been many such cases in the U.S., the UK, and Canada of Muslims refusing to pick up fares with seeing-eye dogs. Many of the Somali taxi drivers who made up three-quarters of the 900 taxi drivers at the Minneapolis airport refused to pick up blind passengers because of their dogs. When forced to do so, some of them simply quit.
Muslims hate dogs because of their evil, demented "prophet":
Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. His teachings may have come from cultural bias, Pagan concepts, or his own imagination, but wherever they came from they led to the cruel treatment of dogs.
None of the statements regarding dogs are found in the Quran but they abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology and are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as "impure" and worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed and all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.
Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of God and as such his word was to be obeyed. With the teeth of Islam biting worldwide it is vital that Muhammad’s teachings be scrutinized to determine if he were a nut or a prophet.
Pinnacles of Human Achievement Update: 1969 Moon Landings vs. 2017 Sports Hijab Edition. pic.twitter.com/k5b1hr8Dcu— Satiria (@SatiriaNews) 9 March 2017
It doesn't matter whether you are a libertarian, a conservative, a liberal, a progressive, or a constitutionalist. Your ideology is outdated and irrelevant. It's all identity politics now, and politics is a subset of war. If the matter cannot be resolved politically - and the fact that this is the largest invasion in human history strongly suggests it cannot be - it will be resolved with violence.
The USA will be physically divided. At this point, the only serious questions are a) where the lines will be drawn, b) the level of violence involved, and c) precisely whom is going to be permitted to remain where.
Latinos are ruthless when it comes to their view and treatment of Blacks. I'm curious to see a) when the colored (anti-white) coalition will fracture and b) how the media narrative will unfold when Blacks are efficiently cleansed from Latino areas.
Brown’s recent lecture offering sly justifications for Islamic slavery and the rape of captured Infidel women has gotten a lot of attention; here is a good summary piece about the controversy from the Daily Caller. Under fire, Brown has backtracked completely.
The Internet never forgets:
That’s great, except it not only contradicts what he said in his speech last Tuesday; it also contradicts what Brown himself said in 2015 in Facebook discussions, in which he avowed that Islam approved of both slavery and rape.
A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.
I'm sure this makes a difference for a slave:
The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States.
Of course, Muslims are also very nice to their slaves:
Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.
The triggering continues:
A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy.
Via Bare Naked Islam:
Imagine if this were 1930, and the Southern Poverty Law Center existed, and it issued a lavishly illustrated, apparently meticulously documented report on critics of the Nazis, dubbing them “anti-German hate group leaders.” There were profiles of Winston Churchill, Edgar Mowrer, and other early critics of Hitler, noting when they had made false claims about Hitler (false, that is, according to the Nazis) and charging them with “hate” and “anti-German bias.”
Imagine then that the mainstream media, whenever it quoted Churchill, Mowrer, or the others, described them as “anti-German,” and noted that the Southern Poverty Law Center said that they were hate group leaders. It would call them “rabble rousers” and “wide boys” and “demogogues.” Quotes from Goebbels and Göring would also invariably be included, calmly explaining the truth of the matters at hand and patiently answering questions about what a shame it was that they had to deal with the likes of Churchill.
The sad thing is that this isn't far from the truth.
A letter from Osama bin Laden detailing when jihadists should be allowed to masturbate has been revealed. The Al-Qaeda leader had such a pull on his followers that he was able to dictate when they pleasured themselves.
Osama also liked to choke the chicken.
In 2015, US officials refused to release details on the 'extensive' porn collection found in Osama bin Laden's Pakistani bolt-hole, because of the 'nature' of the smut.
Man, I feel sorry for all those animals.
Asian Dave: "If you look throughout all of history, the people who have been responsible for the most heinous shit throughout all of history has been the white devil."
Off the top of my head:
- Turkey murders over a million Armenians in the mid to late 1910s.
- Japanese annihilate millions of Chinese in the 1930s.
- Chinese die by the tens of millions thanks to Mao Zedong.
- Cambodian slaughter in the mid to late 1970s.
- Rwanda: nearly a million killed in 1994.
That's just the last hundred years. No race has a monopoly on evil.
Thrashing white people is a very odd way of glorifying non-white peoples. It's always puzzling to me when non-whites living in a largely white, Western nation use their freedoms to ... trash whites. If you truly think that whites are the devils, then why do you live among them? Wouldn't it be moral to live among the, er, angelic, tolerant, pacifist non-whites?
Today’s jihad attack at the Louvre — to which the mujahid is said to have carried a backpack containing paint bombs — suggests that the attacker intended to damage or destroy some of the priceless works of art that are exhibited in the most renowned art museum in the world.
For those who study the Islamic theology and law, the attempt is no surprise. Islam mandates the destruction of art and other artifacts created by infidels, because they represent the jahiliyyah, the “time of ignorance” before Mohammed brought the word of Allah to his disciples.
Bill Warner gives us a brief history lesson:
The people in the video are saying that it's okay to punch "Nazis" because Nazis are intolerant and violent. The followers of Muhammad have murdered far more innocents than the followers of Hitler. Hence, their own logic would work really well if one were to replace the word Nazis with Muslims.
This is why the average American voter despises the media: Trump handed nuclear codes to missiles which could end humanity.
The most powerful armoury in history contains enough nuclear firepower to flatten buildings in an area with a circumference of 48,269 km — an greater than the circumference of the planet.
A city like London would be completely destroyed by a single megaton bomb, meaning the US' 1,027 megatons would eliminate around 1,027 cities the size of central London, or would instantly kill 647 million people, if set off in urban areas.
Oddly enough, such doomsday reporting was utterly absent eight years ago when a conceited, mediocre, buffoon was sworn in.
Today, the man who ruined three political families -- the Bushes, the Clintons and the Obamas -- will become the most powerful man on Earth for eight years. He is the new Reagan. We will see lower taxes, a beautiful wall, the annihilation of ISIS and the fake tears of Muslims.
Proof that God exists!
Today, the first Kenyan, Muslim, affirmative action president of the United States will be put in the dustbin of history.
As Larry Wilmore wouldn't say, "Good riddance, nigga!"
The man tells it like it is:
Four white people kidnapped a black guy and tortured him while calling him a retarded nigger. If that did happen, then the story would have been used as incontrovertible evidence of racist, white supremacist, NAZI Trump's America. Instead it was four blacks who assaulted a white guy.
THEY TOLD ME IF WE ELECTED TRUMP, RACIAL HATE CRIMES WOULD ABOUND. AND THEY WERE RIGHT! Chicago Police: 4 in custody after man tied up, tortured on Facebook Live.
The greatest evils very often take place in response to much lesser ones. If 250 years does not suffice to make a single nation out of two very different peoples, then it should be manifestly apparent that no amount of time is ever going to be enough. The fact that so many people have so much trouble simply admitting the obvious and undeniable is not a testimony to the rational ability of Man, no matter what his race, creed, or color.
As Big Gay Steve has observed, the amount of money that has been spent unsuccessfully trying to turn a mostly unwilling nation of Black Americans into ersatz White Americans would have permitted humanity to have established colonies on Mars. Forget all the victims of all the crimes over the years, and ignore bloodshed of the inevitable wars in the years to come, perhaps the greatest sin of the Civil Rights debacle of the last 50 years is the opportunity cost.
On top of this two centuries of chaos, the left has added Hispanics who, of course, are famous for their brotherly love for blacks. And more recently, the left is trying to bring in more and more Muslims -- who think that blacks are filthy, subhuman barbarians fit to be slaves. You see, the left wants to make an anti-white, voting coalition comprising of Hispanics, Blacks and Muslims!
Yeah, this is going to end well.
One of the many ludicrous demands made by Arabs is the 'Right of Return'. All those muzzies (and their future kids!) who left Israel in 1948 should be allowed to return to Israel. What about all those Jews who were kicked out of Arab countries? Do they get a similar "right"?
The simple, brutal reality is that the Arabs are not interested in peace. They loath Jews because that's built into the DNA of their death cult called Islam. They want the destruction of Israel. It was a mistake to give back the Sinai, the Golan Heights and the Gaza Strip. All it did was bring the enemy closer to the core of Israel.
Muslims are doing their best to make every major nation an enemy. CAIR already loathes the US and her constitution and now these dim clowns are cheering over a Russian plane crash.
Can you imagine a World War III in which the muzzies face off against the Grand Infidel Alliance of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, France, Italy, Russia and China? It almost makes one feel sorry for the wicked fools.
If Muslims actually read history, then they would never mess with Europe. Watching the following video, one word came to my mind: Carthage.
When last year German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to almost one million refugees and asylum seekers, she invited the Trojan horse of Islam into her country. Among the so-called refugees were many young men of Islamic background, filled with hatred for the West and its civilization. One of them was Anis A.
A statistic that keeps popping up is that 99% of Muslims are peaceful. If this is correct, then out of the two million migrants in Germany only 20,000 are maniacal, violent murderers.
This year, 1,500 police officers will be patrolling the streets in Cologne on New Year's eve. Ten times more than last year. But how many police officers will be needed next year? And the year after that? And what will happen when they are outnumbered? What is needed are not just more police officers; what is needed is a democratic political revolution.
Let no-one tell you that only the perpetrators of these crimes are to blame. The politicians, who welcomed Islam into their country, are guilty as well. And it is not just Frau Merkel in Germany, it is the entire political elite in Western Europe.
Out of political-correctness, they have deliberately turned a blind eye to Islam. They have refused to inform themselves about its true nature. They refuse to acknowledge that is all in the Koran: the permission to kill Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one's true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).
The Koran has nothing to do with Islam!
Police investigating tweets blaming Merkel for terror killing.
Breitbart London reported yesterday on the remarks of senior Alternative for Germany (AfD) member Marcus Pretzell, who Tweeted: “When will the German state of law strike back? When will this cursed hypocrisy finally stop? These are Merkel’s dead!”. Mr. Pretzel’s AfD is Germany’s most vocal anti-mass migration party, and has previously warned opening the nation’s borders would make it vulnerable to terror attack.
Now Welt reports Munich police are investigating the tweet for potentially criminal comments.
Love the irony alarm at 6:34.
Only one in 25 British Muslims believe Al Qaeda was responsible for the September 11 attacks on the US, a poll has found.
The research said it was ‘deeply troubling’ that so many were willing to ‘entertain wild and outlandish conspiracy theories’.
Muslims believe that their prophet is the gold standard of morality -- the same man who stole, waged war, raped a nine-year-old girl, kept sex-slaves, slaughtered hundreds of innocent Jews and so on.
When that monster is your role model, it's easy to believe in any bullshit.
Almost half would not report it to the police if someone they knew was involved with supporters of terrorism in Syria.
What's surprising about this is that so many Muslims in the UK admitted the truth: their allegiance lies with their violent muzzie brothers and sisters. These Muslims are the moral, and often financial, support structure for their Jihadi cousins.
The vast majority of Muslims are not violent mass-murdering Jihadis but the ugly truth is that the global majority of Muslims support the Jihadis. To these Muslims, Osama bin Laden was an angel and members of al Qaeda are victims of senseless American aggression. The West has to wake up to this terrible reality.
Mitchell describes the day he was questioning Khalid Sheik Mohammed, when the 9/11 mastermind announced he had something important to say. “KSM then launched into a gory and detailed description of how he beheaded Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl,” Mitchell writes. Up to that moment, the CIA did not know KSM had personally carried out the murder. When asked whether it was “hard to do” (meaning emotionally difficult), KSM misunderstood the question. “Oh, no, no problem,” KSM said, “I had very sharp knives. Just like slaughtering sheep.”
That shows us that at the fundamental level, a lot of infidels simply do not understand the evil essence of Islam.
Oh, he wan't lying about the gruesome murder.
To confirm his story, the CIA had KSM reenact the beheading so that it could compare the features of his hands and forearms to those in the video of Pearl’s murder. “Throughout the reenactment, KSM smiled and mugged for the cameras. Sometimes he preened,” Mitchell writes. When informed that the CIA had confirmed that he was telling the truth, KSM smiled.
“See, I told you,” KSM said. “I cut Daniel’s throat with these blessed hands.”
The next part show us that at a fundamental level, these muzzies don't understand America.
Today, some on both the left and the right argue that al-Qaeda wanted to draw us into a quagmire in Afghanistan — and now the Islamic State wants to do the same in Iraq and Syria. KSM said this is dead wrong. Far from trying to draw us in, KSM said that al-Qaeda expected the United States to respond to 9/11 as we had the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut — when, KSM told Mitchell, the United States “turned tail and ran.” He also said he thought we would treat 9/11 as a law enforcement matter, just as we had the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the USS Cole in Yemen — arresting some operatives and firing a few missiles into empty tents, but otherwise leaving him free to plan the next attack.
Al Qaeda stupidly believed that after the most lethal terrorist attack on record, America would use more police!? Also, see Dec. 7, 1941.
“Then he looked at me and said, ‘How was I supposed to know that cowboy George Bush would announce he wanted us ‘dead or alive’ and then invade Afghanistan to hunt us down?’” Mitchell writes. “KSM explained that if the United States had treated 9/11 like a law enforcement matter, he would have had time to launch a second wave of attacks.” He was not able to do so because al-Qaeda was stunned “by the ferocity and swiftness of George W. Bush’s response.”
The future will be far worse for you and your ilk.
KSM “said jihadi-minded brothers would immigrate into the United States” and “wrap themselves in America’s rights and laws” until they were strong enough to rise up and attack us. “He said the brothers would relentlessly continue their attacks and the American people would eventually become so tired, so frightened, and so weary of war that they would just want it to end.”
“Eventually,” KSM said, “America will expose her neck for us to slaughter.”
Americans also wanted the war to end in the summer of 1945. They didn't surrender. They nuked the enemy. Twice.
So white officer Alan Horujko who shot and killed the Black Somali stabbing suspect in Ohio is being paraded as a hero. Thats interesting— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 28 November 2016
The minute leaders like Castro & others start talking about EQUAL RIGHTS for Blacks and whites, they suddenly become "dictators" & "tyrants"— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 26 November 2016
Castro wanted ALL Cubans-white and Black- to have the same rights. Notice all the Cubans celebrating his death in Miami are WHITE Cubans?— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) 26 November 2016
Tariq Nasheed showed up on Tucker Carlson's show. Nasheed's performance should earn him the Smug Shithead of the Year award.
Ever since his election as Canada’s prime minister last October, Justin Trudeau has revelled in global tributes, raves and swoons. He’s the Disney prince with the trippy dance moves, the groovy Haida tattoo and the gender-balanced cabinet. He’s the last best hope for globalization, the star attraction at the Pride Parades, the hero of the Paris Climate Summit, the guy everyone wants a selfie with.
Trudeau made himself synonymous with Canada. He made Canada cool again. It was fun while it lasted.
By the early hours of Saturday morning, Havana time, Trudeau was an international laughing stock.
Just wait till one of the Syrian refugees detonates. No one will laugh at him then.
For all the parochial Canadian susceptibility to the propaganda myth that pits a shabby-bearded rebel in olive fatigues against the imperialist American hegemon, by the time he died on Friday night Castro was one of the richest men in Latin America. Ten years ago, when he was handing the presidency to Raúl, Forbes magazine calculated that Fidel’s personal wealth was already nearly a billion dollars.
The reality of socialism.