Begging for extermination

Bengali Rohingya Muslims threaten Buddhists: “You Buddhists are infidels and if you don’t convert to Islam, we will kill you.” The young boy was nearly burned to death and Buddhist homes in the area are routinely set on fire…even today.

Looks like the Buddhists reached their limits after decades of persistent warfare from Bengali Muslims.

This is the tragedy of it all. Muslims are assaulting infidels all over the world -- in China, Russia, Europe, Africa, Israel, and North America. The response to such carnage is unfortunately too lenient. Why? Because the death tolls are not catastrophic. Look at the numbers from the two World Wars. Muslims are using crude methods to murder only a few non-Muslims.

Of course, such muted reactions only propel Muslims to increase the intensity of their assaults. Sometimes, they manage to slaughter hundreds or thousands in one coordinated attack. Still, the West and other nations don't fight back with their full might.

I fear that the Muslim world will be in for a very rude shock when the Jihadists get a hold of a biological, chemical or, worse, a nuclear weapon. The response to that atrocity will result in the most lethal war in human history.


The lure of power

Looking into the dark abyss:

I knew immediately when he first appeared on screen peering out of a sewer while drooling, giggling, and biting off a child's arm, that Pennywise could get it.

And by it, I mean my vagina.

Cameras recorded the visits of Hitler in various towns and cities in Germany. Women flocked all around. Hitler was a rock star. The gals adored him. Had he been slicing up Jews and eating them Lecter-style on his trips, the ladies would have become more wet.


The Nazis, literally

Nazi Germany assaulted the following countries in WWII: Poland, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Denmark, Greece, Norway, Britain, Soviet Russia, etc.

You'll notice that Nazis were largely slaughtering White people.

One of the great ironies of the Alt-Reich is that they claim to be National Socialists, some "ironically", some not so much, while also claiming that "saving the white race" is their primary goal. However, this is akin to ants claiming that dressing up as anteaters and eating other ants is the way to save the ant species.

The Nazis were Leftists who murdered millions of White people


Pakis gone wild

One Pakistani girl in England writes about the rampant discrimination against minorities in Pakistan. One of her tweets:

She makes a valid point.

She gets this surreal response from another Pakistani woman:

From 1947 to 1971, we had West Pakistan and East Pakistan. What happened?

Condensed answer: The East wanted its own nation. The Pakistanis from the Western side raped approximately 400,000 women and murdered up to 3 million in the East. The East left and became independent. It became Bangladesh. The raping, genocidal side is now simply called Pakistan.

A White guy did his research and pointed out this obvious history:

To this simple, effective, elegant thrashing, the gutter vomited back:

Chutiya = cunt.

Gora = White.

No wonder so many countries around the globe are deporting Pakistanis. It's comical because it's mostly non-gora, Islamic countries who are doing this.


Smug children

Victor Davis Hanson:

Ours is an age that passes easy judgment on prior generations by sandblasting away the mention of those deemed unsuitable in the past, often by our present and sometimes laudable standards of morality—but without much concession to the cruel physical landscapes and poverty of the past or our own shortcomings that will be all too clear to subsequent ages. Which prompts more activist outrage by Antifa—a century-old sullen statue of a beaten secessionist Robert E. Lee or the indifference shown to unchecked bloodletting and murder in the streets of Chicago?

This story never gets old:

Two years later [after 9/11] I gave a lecture on illegal immigration to congressional staffers on Capitol Hill; an activist who was a liberal California House member’s aide, disrupted it, screaming that because I was a “classicist” I must believe in “classist” privilege and “classist” prejudice—and therefore should not be allowed to continue. Again, arrogance and ignorance are our era’s trademark.

Yup. Sadly, this is not limited to the US. The forefather of modern-day Spaniards fought with Muslims for almost 800 years to reclaim the Iberian Peninsula. Earlier this year, tens of thousands of people in Barcelona marched to open their borders to the heirs of those same barbarians and savages who were expelled.

Now, blood runs in the streets of Spain.


Neo-genesis of malevolence

Spencer Case:

Muhammad, who was a warrior as well a prophet, declined to disguise his religious intolerance. In his “farewell sermon” in 632 C.E., he said: “The earth belongs to Allah and His Messenger. Until people say, “There is no god but Allah,” and accept me as His Messenger, I have been commanded to struggle and fight with them.” Ayatollah Khomeini and Osama bin Laden echoed these words to justify their actions. On his deathbed, Muhammad also reported to have said: “Two religions will not live together in the land of the Arabs.” These words would be out of place an interfaith potluck, to say the least. And note that Muhammad spoke them after his pagan enemies had been vanquished.

And now 24% of humanity is chained to this centuries-old evil.


Destruction is easy

February 2017:

Tens of thousands of people marched through Barcelona on Saturday urging the Spanish government to immediately meet its pledge to take in thousands of refugees.

800 years. That's how long it took the Spaniards to throw out the Moors from their homeland. Now, their ignorant and deluded descendants are opening the gates for the same evil. All it took is a few months for the death and carnage to begin again.

August 2017:


Civil War II

Twitchy:

Vice deleted a tweet this afternoon that indicated something many predicted: That the push to remove certain historic symbols (one way or another) wouldn’t stop at Confederate statues.

Of course. Vice wants to blow up Mount Rushmore.

Taking down statues is merely the beginning for the monkeys on the Left. They want to tear down all "problematic" symbols and icons. Considering that every historical American was flawed in some way, the destruction of any and all figures can be "rationalized".

  • George Washington: owned slaves. DESTROY.
  • Thomas Jefferson: owned slaves. DESTROY.
  • Abraham Lincoln: didn't free slaves in 70% of the US. DESTROY.
  • Teddy Roosevelt: fucking a white male! DESTROY.

Don't give them an inch.


Insincere outrage

PoliZette:

Military historian and political columnist Victor Davis Hanson said the “moral smugness” of this current generation allows it to “pick and choose their type of outrage for political purposes,” all the while adhering to a “double standard,” during an interview Wednesday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.”

If a historical figure is imperfect, then he's no good and any image, symbol or statue of that person needs to be torn down. That's the crazy and insincere logic of the Left. The Right in the future is going to use the same rules to obliterate Leftist icons and Islamic structures. Think about it: the Left and Muslims are responsible for mountains of skulls all over the world. Why should these two evils be tolerated?

More:

Hanson said Krauthammer was applying a certain double standard to Trump.

"I agree that [Trump] should have said it earlier. But the fact is, he did say it, and I don't think it was because it wasn't in his heart," he responded. "I do think he's not a racist by any means. And I don't understand Charles Krauthammer, because after the policemen were killed by a racist sniper, people asked Barack Obama to condemn the type of movement that had led to that, the Black Lives Matter. And he said the problem was guns."

"And in Fort Hood, that person yelled 'Allahu Akbar' as he killed and mowed down and butchered 13 people. And Obama said, 'Let's not rush to judgment,'" Hanson added. "If Trump had said, rather than blaming both sides for the cycle of violence, 'Let's not rush to judgment,' people would have been outraged."

You can listen to the entire interview here. It's from 21:25 to 34:22.


Fake history

I once had a long conversation with a Leftist in university. The talk turned to WWII. One simple statement from me resulted in a shocked burst from him: THE NAZIS WERE NOT SOCIALISTS.

Just to be sure, I asked him, "You think that the Nazis were not socialists; that they are not left wing?"

"Of course NOT. They are totally right wing."

"What does Nazi stand for? What's the full term?"

Silence.

A number of historically ignorant defenders of national socialism have tried to claim that it is not a left-wing socialist ideology. This is utterly and absolutely false, and can be easily and conclusively proven to be false in a number of ways, including by reading a number of direct quotes from Mr. Hitler himself.

Vox Day presents the quotes from Literally literal Hitler.

We live in an insane world where:

A) Hitler who was demonstrably a Leftist is described as the entire Right side of the political spectrum.

B) The Pedophile Prophet Muhammad who was historically a genocidal, slavery-loving, Jew-hating, monster is presented as the gold standard of human morality and thus who ought not be disrespected in any way, shape or form.

Fake news is good at creating fake history.


Unite the Right

Sargon does an excellent job of showcasing the acceptable hatred and degradation of Whites in American circles. The Left has been playing the anti-White identity politics game. The Right is starting to reply in kind.

War has been a normal state of mankind. The world hasn't seen a major conflict since WWII. We are due for a big one. Civil War in the US is coming, the Muslims are invading Europe, and the Chinese are waiting and watching. The next two decades will be ugly.


American history by "Muslims"

Osama, the Taliban, and Saddam would have been like the Boy Scouts had the US not turned them to the dark side:

After World War II:

  1. The Soviet Union oppressed the peoples of Eastern Europe.
  2. The Soviet Gulag system had over two million people who were used as slaves.
  3. In 1956, Soviet tanks rolled in Hungary to crush the rebellion.

Who is to blame for this colossal harm?

That radical Episcopalian President FDR! That diabolical son of a bitch sent $, trucks, horses, etc. to the Soviet Union in the 1940s. You can't run from your evil legacy, FDR!

That is how you write history the "Muslim" way. No matter what bad things non-Americans do, just go back a few years or a decade and connect the wickedness to the Americans.


The Czechs Remember

We know they remember in Normandy, France, where so many American soldiers are buried. But this is an amazing, if little known story of honor and remembrance by the Czech people for our soldiers, that I doubt many Americans have ever heard. At BNI, we celebrate the Czech Republic, as one of the Eastern bloc countries steadfastly fighting against the Muslim invasion plaguing Western Europe. Despite EU threats of sanctions and huge fines for refusing to take their mandated quota of Muslims, the Czechs don’t cave.

It's rare for a country to show gratitude to another for sacrifices which were made generations ago.


Orgies by Allah

Syamsuddin Nur Makkah was a touch too blunt:

An Indonesian celebrity Islamic cleric has come under fire for suggesting that Muslims are promised sex parties in heaven during a recent televised sermon.

How dare he tell the lewd truth!?

PedoMo was very clever in offering his warriors sex-slaves in the present and dozens of young women and boys for their sexual pleasure in the afterlife. What better way to get useless sexless horny men on your side in a polygamous culture.


Defining Nazi in the current year

Europe opened its gates and invited in millions of Muslims over the past few years. For that act of (asinine and suicidal) generosity, this is the thanks infidels get:

A leader of a hardline Islamist group has compared the treatment of Muslims to the massacre of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust.

Are there any examples provided to justify such a ridiculous comparison?

'Muslims are told that in order to be accepted they must conform to a certain set of values different to their own.'

That's it. That's all it takes. If you want immigrants to assimilate, then you're a Nazi. This definition makes diabolical sense given the following:

Mr Qureshi's comments come after fellow Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar was captured on camera saying Muslims who leave the religion should be put to death.

Just to be clear:

  • When Muslims are sugarcoating their religion and trying to convert infidels, that's called religious freedom.
  • When a dim infidel embraces the wickedness of Islam, then that person deserves congratulations.
  • When an infidel wants Muslims to embrace their values, that's practically the Holocaust.
  • When a Muslim leaves Islam, then death is the penalty.

It's impossible to resolve these differences peacefully.

War is coming.


Fifty shades of Hitler

You mean that German dictator with whom the Muslims had such warm ties? They did share a mutual love for murdering the Jews, the Yahood, the Zionists.

Also, Muslim girls can't help but get wet for that "certain German dictator":

"I interrupted one of the girls who said that Hitler was her favorite figure, asking her: 'Are you serious or joking?' She looked at me, amazed, and replied: 'Yes, I am serious.' This led another girl to add: 'I too love Hitler's personality.' I asked the first girl: 'What do you like about Hitler's personality?' She responded, very confidently: 'His strength, and his ability to unite his country's military and leadership and to stand fast in war.' I asked her: 'Do you realize that his strength caused an entire world war, and the destruction of Germany and France?' She responded: 'Yes. I read his book Mein Kampf and was impressed by his strength, his faith, and his perseverance.'

So, logically, the Muslimas are fantasizing about being Donald Trump Junior's fuck toy strength, faith and perseverance.


Going full SJW

It used to be that high-profile Hollywood World War II movies got called out for taking liberties with the facts. These days, they’re getting in trouble for being too historically accurate.

This is about Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk. So, what's the problem?

Plenty of people have taken to social media to express why they won’t be seeing it, and it’s all to do with the movie being “too white.” (Not sure if they’re aware, but the vast majority of British and Allied forces were white.)

Damn right! Personally, I won't rest till the role of Hitler is played by Morgan Freeman.

Because diversity!

Seriously, can you imagine, some ignorant, dumbass going on social media and writing that he won't be watching Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon because it's "too yellow"? 


Going full Islam

Just sixty years ago, Egyptian politicians were laughing at a "hijab law". The cultural attitude was similar in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The entire Islamic arena seems to have regressed since then. Places that were relatively liberal and free (prime example: Lebanon) have been shattered and reformed into violent, Jihadist entities.

Worse, this chaos is now spilling into the Western world.


June 6, 1944

Operation Overlord was the code name for the Battle of Normandy, the Allied operation that launched the successful invasion of German-occupied western Europe during World War II. The operation commenced on 6 June 1944 with the Normandy landings (Operation Neptune, commonly known as D-Day). A 1,200-plane airborne assault preceded an amphibious assault involving more than 5,000 vessels. Nearly 160,000 troops crossed the English Channel on 6 June, and more than three million Allied troops were in France by the end of August.

What a cataclysm. Millions and millions of young men from the Western world got annihilated to prove a banality: Germany couldn't fight against the combined might of the US, UK and Russia.


The charming life in modern London

Bare Naked Islam on the infantile mindset of the police in the UK:

During the midst of Saturday’s latest Islamic terrorist attack in London, the city’s Metropolitan police department tweeted an infographic giving the public a three-step plan to respond to the attack. “Run. Hide. Tell,” read the three points on the infographic.

How times have changed:


World War M approaches

This is a fatal ignorance of history. Peoples of the West stubbornly desire peace and abhor violence. So much so that they'll make terrible decisions to avoid conflict today to only guarantee a more lethal war in the future. British appeasement of the Nazis throughout the 1930s is a sad example.

The West hasn't even started to engage in war against Muslims. Worse, the West hasn't even identified the proper enemy. The accelerating rate of atrocities from the Religion of Peace will result in:

  1. The rise of nationalist political parties.
  2. The Expulsion of Muslims from the West.
  3. A total Muslim immigration ban in the West.

If after that Muslims still manage to assault the West, then the war will begin. Eventually, many Muslim countries will be remembered like Carthage.


The opposite of truth

Race hustler Linda Sarsour really scrapes the bottom of the gutter when she claims that paedophillic warlord Mohammed was actually a human rights activist, the first victim of Islamophobia, and a feminist. Words fail me.

According to Linda Sarsour, Muhammad was also a racial justice activist, an environmentalist, an animal rights activist etc. The video is unintentionally hilarious:

In addition, the so-called prophet Muhammad was:

  • a huge fan of Harambe.
  • a Climate Change believer.
  • in favor of a $25 minimum wage.
  • a supporter of free health care including birth control.
  • pleasantly surprised with New Coke. Death to Classic Coke!

Dear White People

Muslim Girl:

TRIGGER WARNING: “This show is meant for both Black and White audiences and every other color imaginable” as Variety magazine critiques. If discussing race makes you uncomfortable and you want to just comment below without reading this or watching the show, don’t waste your time. You have been warned.

More:

The title “Dear White People” is controversial to some, but that doesn’t mean that this show is attacking White people. For anyone who thinks White people can be victims of racism, let Samantha White (Tessa Thompson circa 2014) remind you this:

New racism

Imagine if a white person said that "Black people are incapable of X". People would call for his head. Now, the fun part:

Black people have never held a system of power and used it against white people. Name one point in history when white people have been marginalized and antagonized because of their race when mostly people of color were in power.

Okay. A really old, obscure, historical example ... from 2014:

Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe has called on the country's remaining white farmers to cede land to black people. "We say no to whites owning our land and they should go," Mr Mugabe told his supporters at a rally.

Yup, blacks are, like, totally incapable of being racist because they've, like, never ever ever held a system of power and used it against white people. Blacks are, like, so angelic and innocent and pure. That's why they commit so few crimes in the US.

Burning Question: Do Muslims ever get tired of lying?


Murdering Jews is always awesome

Adolf Hitler -- an infidel loved and admired by Muslims:

Canadian Jewish organizations are outraged after a London, Ont. magazine published an anti-Semitic editorial that tries to justify the Holocaust.

Al Saraha, a monthly magazine printed in Arabic and widely distributed around the city, recently printed an article with the headline "The Question Which Everyone Ignores: Why Did Hitler Kill the Jews?"

The article claims the number of people killed in the holocaust is grossly overestimated and it outlines the author's theories about why the atrocities were justified.

Sounds legit. As we know Arabs are famous for their honesty and scholarly output.


Feminism is cancer

As women, especially White women who agitate most loudly for the feminist dystopia, have abandoned their prime directive — birthing the next generation — they have continued to receive largesse from the State. This is unsustainable on both genetic and economic levels. If women turn away from their natural function but continue to receive the State privileges that come attached to an assumption of fertility and child-raising, what we’ll have is an institutionalized system that privatizes profits (female coddling) and socializes costs (mass immigration to provide an ever-exapanding base of consumers for the technoborg).

Yup. What's truly profound is that immigration only kicks the can down the road. You see, most immigrants soon align their birth rates with the host population. Solution? More immigration!

That's what Canada has been doing for over thirty years. After all that, the overall Canadian birth rate is still woefully below replacement level. Today, how can a sane, average Canadian couple afford to start a family when the average house goes for over half a million dollars!?

The Ponzi-scheme-style system will have to be radically changed or eventually it will collapse.


The evil essence of the Left

Three additional reasons:

1. Because, somehow, the Nationalist Socialists are considered part of the Right!

2. The Commies were on the winning side in WWII. They defeated the evil Nazis! Ergo, they must be good.

3. Communist regimes still exist today. Obviously, they won't tarnish their ideological ancestors. Worse, the "free world" accommodates them. Just look at how Hollywood bows down to Chinese demands by censoring movies to not offend the regime.


Those mythical moderate muslims

The only solution is Islam reforming itself? Good luck with that. It's kind of difficult to reform Islam into a peaceful religion when its messenger was an intolerant, Jew-murdering, pillaging, paedophile, warlord. Worse, to say that Muhammad was, in any way, immoral is to court death.

Islam, by design, is the last and most perfect religion. It is not malleable. For a Muslim to even suggest that it be changed is to declare oneself a heretic. How do you bring about a moderate Islam when the act of reforming it is a capital punishment? This largely explains why Islam hasn't firmly softened in almost 1400 years. If anything it has gotten more close to its loathsome roots in the recent past. This evidence is most stark in Egypt, Lebanon, Iran and Afghanistan.

The least violent solution for the West is to simply keep Muslims out and to speak the harsh and ugly truth about the evil cult of death.

Update
At the very heart of Islam:

Saudi Arabia has sentenced an atheist to death for uploading a video in which he renounced Islam and the Prophet Mohammed. The man has been identified locally as Ahmad Al Shamri who is in his 20s and from the town of Hafar al-Batin.

Saudi authorities first picked him up in 2014 after he uploaded the video showing men and women dancing which led to him being charged with atheism and blasphemy.

And in a shockingly shocking development:

Shockingly, fellow countrymen appeared to support the punishment handed down by the country's officials when reacting to the sanction online. According to The Independent, one said: 'If you're a lowkey atheist that's fine. 'But once you talk in public and criticize God or religion, then you shall be punished.'

Another poster said: 'I wish there could be live streaming when you cut his head off.'

Can you feel the peace?


Refusing to acknowledge evil

Andrew Neil is an utterly clueless moron:

More retarded questions:

  • What did the Americans do to deserve 9/11?
  • What did the Russian children do to deserve the Beslan Massacre?
  • What did the British do to deserve the London bombings on 7/7/2005?
  • What did the French do to deserve the truck attack in Nice last year?

A few asinine questions for WWII:

  • What did the British do to deserve the Blitz?
  • What did the Jews do to deserve the Holocaust?
  • What did the Chinese do to deserve the Nanking Massacre?
  • What did the Poles do to deserve being crushed by Germans and Russians?

The Notorious A.H.A.

Muslim Girl:

Persons of Interest, a media organization dedicated to conversations about social justice, published a powerful video featuring a diverse group of Australian Muslim women sending a clear and potent message to Ayaan Hirsi Ali: You do not speak for us.

So brave.

The 2-minute video rejects Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s blatant Islamophobia and vehemently claims that she does not represent Muslim women. The video describes her hateful rhetoric as “language used to justify wars, invasion and genocide” and “encourages fear, persecution and violence.”

Do they provide even a single example of such language which encourages "violence". Nope. But we can be sure that they are telling the truth because they're Muslims.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an ex-Muslim and notorious Islamophobe, who has repeatedly profited from bashing and attacking Islam.

Oddly enough, those mythical profits are never communicated. Islam -- the Cult of Death -- calls for her to be murdered. Is that part of her "profit"? Theo Van Gogh, her friend, was attacked and killed in broad daylight in Denmark in 2004. Perhaps, that's also a portion of her "profit"? Ayaan eventually left Denmark in 2007 because the government refused to provide her security which had cost them millions of dollars. "Profit"?

Ignore the Islamic hatred towards a slave who got away. Deny the truth. Just remember: The no-good, very bad, super evil, the Notorious Ayaan Hirsi Ali!


The Land of Filth

Pakistan was meant to be a model, an example for other nations to emulate. It was founded after World War II, as the sun was setting on the British Empire and India was preparing for independence. India’s Muslims, though glad to see the end of the Raj, were apprehensive about becoming a minority in a Hindu-majority land.

They envisioned instead what might be called a “two-state solution”: the establishment of a homeland for the subcontinent’s Muslims in areas where Muslims were in the majority. Their new nation was to be free, pluralist and tolerant. “We are starting with this fundamental principle,” Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader) declared in 1947, “that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State.”

Jinnah died one year later.

The very creation of Pakistan was a mistake for two big reasons.

1. Pakistan is the original Islamic State. This leaves no room for infidels. 23% of the population of Pakistan was non-Muslim in 1947. Today, it's 3%. The country is a case study in how a society tortures and mutilates itself when it enforces sharia with more vigour with each passing year. We see more honor killings, acid attacks, wretched blasphemy laws, explicit legal discrimination against a minority, etc.

2. Pakistan is not a nation-state. There are four provinces in the country. Each of them has an officially unique provincial language, slightly different food, a dissimilar culture and diverse clothing styles. The relatively cosmopolitan, Urdu-speaking, Bollywood-obsessed, bhangra-crazy peoples of Punjab have barely anything in common with the Pashto-speaking, AK-47-wielding, week-smoking, bacha-baazi-enthusiasts of the North West Frontier Province.

Because of this corrosive reality, Pakistan has already cracked once in 1971 -- East Pakistan became Bangladesh.

The only thing that can be used to barely hold it together is the strict, ruthless enforcement of an old evil: Islam.


Angels hate dogs

Why Do So Many Muslims Hate Dogs?

There have been many such cases in the U.S., the UK, and Canada of Muslims refusing to pick up fares with seeing-eye dogs. Many of the Somali taxi drivers who made up three-quarters of the 900 taxi drivers at the Minneapolis airport refused to pick up blind passengers because of their dogs. When forced to do so, some of them simply quit.

Muslims hate dogs because of their evil, demented "prophet":

Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. His teachings may have come from cultural bias, Pagan concepts, or his own imagination, but wherever they came from they led to the cruel treatment of dogs.

None of the statements regarding dogs are found in the Quran but they abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology and are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as "impure" and worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed and all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.

Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of God and as such his word was to be obeyed. With the teeth of Islam biting worldwide it is vital that Muhammad’s teachings be scrutinized to determine if he were a nut or a prophet.


Broken States of America

Vox Day:

It doesn't matter whether you are a libertarian, a conservative, a liberal, a progressive, or a constitutionalist. Your ideology is outdated and irrelevant. It's all identity politics now, and politics is a subset of war. If the matter cannot be resolved politically - and the fact that this is the largest invasion in human history strongly suggests it cannot be - it will be resolved with violence.

The USA will be physically divided. At this point, the only serious questions are a) where the lines will be drawn, b) the level of violence involved, and c) precisely whom is going to be permitted to remain where.

True.

Latinos are ruthless when it comes to their view and treatment of Blacks. I'm curious to see a) when the colored (anti-white) coalition will fracture and b) how the media narrative will unfold when Blacks are efficiently cleansed from Latino areas.


Taqiyya fail

Cockroaches don't like the light:

Brown’s recent lecture offering sly justifications for Islamic slavery and the rape of captured Infidel women has gotten a lot of attention; here is a good summary piece about the controversy from the Daily Caller. Under fire, Brown has backtracked completely.

The Internet never forgets:

That’s great, except it not only contradicts what he said in his speech last Tuesday; it also contradicts what Brown himself said in 2015 in Facebook discussions, in which he avowed that Islam approved of both slavery and rape.


The face of Islam

Rape and slavery are bad ... unless Muslims do it:

A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.

I'm sure this makes a difference for a slave:

The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States.

Of course, Muslims are also very nice to their slaves:

Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.

The triggering continues:

A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy.

Surprise sex!


Naziphobia of the 1930s

Imagine if this were 1930, and the Southern Poverty Law Center existed, and it issued a lavishly illustrated, apparently meticulously documented report on critics of the Nazis, dubbing them “anti-German hate group leaders.” There were profiles of Winston Churchill, Edgar Mowrer, and other early critics of Hitler, noting when they had made false claims about Hitler (false, that is, according to the Nazis) and charging them with “hate” and “anti-German bias.”

Imagine then that the mainstream media, whenever it quoted Churchill, Mowrer, or the others, described them as “anti-German,” and noted that the Southern Poverty Law Center said that they were hate group leaders. It would call them “rabble rousers” and “wide boys” and “demogogues.” Quotes from Goebbels and Göring would also invariably be included, calmly explaining the truth of the matters at hand and patiently answering questions about what a shame it was that they had to deal with the likes of Churchill.

The sad thing is that this isn't far from the truth