Abed reasons, it’s sometimes “morally required” to commit genocide, and he hasn’t been shy about advancing that argument in a series of lectures and essays that have somehow managed to stay under the radar of the media (especially the right-leaning media) over the past few years.
Abed lays out his central thesis in the paper’s abstract: “Genocide is not in any sense distinctively heinous. Nor is it necessarily immoral.”
Muslims really don't get the core of the West. They don't understand that the people of the West, when pushed too far, will retaliate with extreme lethal force. If Muslims go nuclear with their genocidal rhetoric, then Hiroshima and Nagasaki will be eclipsed by Mecca and Madina.
In the end, we will get a genocide -- just not the one Abed wants.