« Intel Should Take Note | Main | "What is this nonsense?" »
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Unveiling Islam
Times Online via Michelle Malkin:
The growing number of women veiling their faces in Britain is a sign of radicalisation. I was disturbed when, after my first year at university in 1988, I discovered to my surprise that some of my fellow students had turned very religious and had taken to wearing the jilbab (a long, flowing gown covering all the body except hands and face), which they had never worn before and which was not the dress code of their mothers. They had joined the college’s Islamic Society, which preached that women were not considered proper Muslims unless they adopted such strict dress codes. After that, I never really had anything in common with them.
Good.
[...] if we can’t have a debate about the veil without a vocal minority of Muslims crying “Islamophobia”, how will we face other issues, such as domestic violence, forced marriages, sexual abuse and child abuse that are rife in the Muslim community? These are not uniquely Muslim problems but, unlike other communities, they are never openly debated. It is children and women who suffer as a result.
Quite right.
I have written about abuse here:
The following post is my take on life of a woman in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: Honor in Slavery.
Posted by Isaac Schrödinger at 11:55 AM in Politics, World War IV | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451baae69e200d834bbfc6a53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unveiling Islam:
Comments
"Unveiling" is too polite, too dainty a word for what's at stake and how to deal with it. What's called for instead is more like "unraveling" or "ripping off" the veil.
Making Westerners (esp. white men) defensive about their motives to "see behind the veil" is a "postcolonial" trick I was indoctrinated into while a student of postmodern literary theory. I'll suffer none of that ever again.
Posted by: Jeremayakovka | Oct 12, 2006 7:12:58 PM



