Useful Infidels and Ostriches

David Horowitz links to a useful infidel:

The lengthy cover story on the war on terror written by Mark Danner in the magazine section of the Sunday New York Times is little more than an apology for the Islamic terrorists who are seeking to destroy us. Danner, a Nation leftist, demonstrates in the course of this article that he didn't understand the Cold War (or rather regarded America as the villain), doesn't understand the war on terror or the war in Iraq and thinks the religious fanatics of al-Qaeda who murder innocents to go to heaven are really critics of American foreign policy who are upset about the Arab dictatorships in the Middle East: "Fundamentalist Islamic thought took aim at America's policies, not its existence." This sentence is so preposterous, so ignorant of radical Islam from Sayyid Qutb to the Ayatollah Khomeini, that it is hard to believe Danner wrote it let alone that he believes it, but he does.

[Emphasis mine]

Four years and counting, and Mark Danner is still ignorant. Perhaps, he'll like to tell the vacationing Australians about their rude policies. Or tell the Russian kids to change their infidel lifestyle. Or illuminate the Iraqis about their eeevil democratic ways. Sigh. Why, oh why, does the MSM have so many unwitting tits on its payroll?

Charles links to an ostrich:

Four years after the September 11 attacks, Mohammad-Mahmoud Ould Mohamedou has an op-ed in the Boston Globe asking: Time to talk to Al Qaeda? (Hat tip: Daily Pundit.)

Read what the lizards have to say about this intellectual moron.