« Doh Robber | Main | Asia in 20 Years »

Monday, January 24, 2005

Mr. Prager, Part Three

Mr. Prager writes Part Three in a series of columns defending Judeo-Christian values. It was written almost a week ago and I unfortunately missed it.

Did those non-Jews in Europe who risked their lives to save a Jew during the Holocaust act on the dictates of reason? In a lifetime of studying those rescuers' motives, I have never come across a single instance of an individual who saved Jews because of reason. In fact, it was irrational for any non-Jews to risk their lives to save Jews.

...the belief in reason alone is itself based on an irrational belief -- that people are basically good. You have to believe that people are basically good in order to believe that human reason will necessarily lead to moral conclusions.

History is littered with the ruins of nations because of the evil few. I certainly would not want to live in a Godless world.

...if you want a quick evaluation of where godless reason leads, look at the irrationality and moral confusion that permeate the embodiment of reason without God -- your local university.

Sadly, that's true at my university as well.

Posted by Isaac Schrödinger at 06:40 PM in World War IV | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451baae69e200d834217b6353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mr. Prager, Part Three:

» Dennis Prager on Judeo-Christian Values from The Fire Ant Gazette
Dennis Prager is writing a column on the foundations of Judeo-Christian beliefs. In his latest offering, he explains why the thinking that man can make morally correct choices via reason and logic alone is wrong. [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 25, 2005 10:42:48 PM

» Dennis Prager on Judeo-Christian Values from The Fire Ant Gazette
Dennis Prager is writing a column on the foundations of Judeo-Christian beliefs. In his latest offering, he explains why the thinking that man can make morally correct choices via reason and logic alone is wrong. [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 21, 2006 8:15:58 AM

Comments

Post a comment